Tuesday, September 21, 2004
Well...yeah...maybe we spoke too soon about backing the proposition in Colorado to split up it's nine electoral votes by popular proportion. Maybe Wampum was correct to fret a little. Many recent polls appear to show Kerry gaining a lot of ground there and Race 2004 (of which we only recently became aware) projects Kerry as the winner.
Colorado's potential blueness may be coupled with a Wisconsin (10 votes) win for Bushie Boy. That means Kerry might need all nine CO votes and then some. Still, it would be fairly amazing to see Wisconsin (or Iowa, for that matter) break the Damfa Dukakis rule, which holds that no state (cept WV) that was blue in '88 can possibly choose Bush.
Meanwhile, we are planning for Bill Clinton to deliver Arkansas. The Shrub hasn't polled over 50% there since June 6, and isn't seeing much over 48%. Kerry needs to hold Gore's states and pick up Arkansas and NH. That's 270. If Colorado and Wisconsin swap, Kerry (269) needs a little something else, we'll say Nevada (274 [or 270 if Colorado splits its electorals]).
The rules of the three debates have been released. CNN lists some of them.
We sure wish there was a rule that the candidates ears' must be checked for transmittors because the Shrub will want to use one and just may. Why wouldn't he?
This is so much fun to read. It is very unlikely that it is legitimate but man, is it fun to read.
The telescreen train is completely off the rails - it's really unprecedented. The other congloms want Viacom's head on a platter, apparently. The whole thing is sick and now they are trying to drag in the Kerry campaign. In the words of a Kubrick character: "It's a big shit sandwich and we're all gonna have to take a bite."
For the record, here are the news "anchors" that we don't completely distrust:
Aaron Brown, CNN Newsnight 10:00 pm
Keith Olbermann, Countdown MSNBC 8:00 pm
Jon Stewart, Daily Show Comedy Central 11:00 pm
Bill Moyers, NOW PBS, 8:30 pm, Fridays
Jim Lehrer, PBS, 7:00 pm
On the way:
Besides reading his "Top 10" list, Kerry also poked fun at the tedious debate negotiations between the rival campaigns that ended in agreement Monday. Kerry said he wanted running mate John Edwards to stand in the vice presidential debate, but Cheney wanted to sit. "We compromised and now George Bush is going to sit on Dick Cheney's lap," he said.
Thru the best blogger in America, Atrios, we see the Squinting Smirking Shirker still can't keep his boogeymen straight. The AP article actually cites five "mistakes" he's made about this same guy. we're betting he won't "slip up" and mention Ali Abbas any time soon:
During remarks in Derry, N.H., Bush said the late terrorist Abu Nidal killed Leon Klinghoffer, a 69-year-old Jewish American who died after being tossed - along with his wheelchair - off a hijacked cruise liner named Achille Lauro in 1985.``Do you remember Abu Nidal?'' Bush asked the crowd. ``He's the guy that killed Leon Klinghoffer. Leon Klinghoffer was murdered because of his religion. Abu Nidal was in Baghdad, as was his organization.''
He repeated the mistake Monday evening at a campaign event in New York City: ``Abu Nidal was a cold-blooded terrorist killer who killed Leon Klinghoffer.''
Actually, it was Abul Abbas, the leader of a violent Palestinian group, who killed Klinghoffer.
He's been watching the battleground states and his polls for the WSJ make sense. Gallup is junk, although, unlike the "bloggers" who "won" the war against CBS, no one in the media is interested in explaining to the public why bloggers know Gallup is junk.
We have been waiting for this Zogby poll update and if it reflects election day, the good guys will win. Some really good news, Kerry is ahead in: NM by 13; MN by 9; IA by 7, WI by 2. Smile, smile, smile.
Iraq is falling apart and it's getting harder for the Shrub to hide it from the American people. The CIA already told him the jig is up (more than once) and even Republicans are grumbling, including one Senator from RI who says he may just have to go with a write-in candidate. Soldiers are keen on "Farenheit 9/11," sour on Shrub, and the Brits are going to yank a third of their troops next month.
The media giants can obsess all they want about Dan Rather but John Kerry is getting predatorial about Bush's muderous bungling in Iraq and turning on the lights around here.
Kerry said Monday, "Is he really saying to Americans that if we had known there were no imminent threat, no weapons of mass destruction, no ties to al-Qaida, the United States should have invaded Iraq? My answer is resoundingly no because a commander in chief's first responsibility is to make a wise and responsible decision to keep America safe."
"Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who deserves his own special place in hell," Kerry said. "But that was not, in itself, a reason to go to war. The satisfaction we take in his downfall does not hide this fact: We have traded a dictator for a chaos that has left America less secure."
Monday, September 20, 2004
The blind-eyed GOP hack is writing that sources tell him the Shrub will pull out American troops next year. We know that this is designed to help Bush, so what's the angle? It appears that the Cartel wants moderate people to believe that the stay the course message is just politics, so they can vote with an assurance that we will walk soon.
Well-placed sources in the administration are confident Bush's decision will be to get out. They believe that is the recommendation of his national security team and would be the recommendation of second-term officials. An informed guess might have Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state, Paul Wolfowitz as defense secretary and Stephen Hadley as national security adviser. According to my sources, all would opt for a withdrawal.
Getting out now would not end expensive U.S. reconstruction of Iraq, and certainly would not stop the fighting. Without U.S. troops, the civil war cited as the worst-case outcome by the recently leaked National Intelligence Estimate would be a reality. It would then take a resolute president to stand aside while Iraqis battle it out.
Menawhile, the true kool-aid drinkers will dismiss the article as rumor, because their Dear Smirkhead would never retreat.
Anytime you see someone from the American Enterprise Institute, no matter how familiar they seem, remember they are a shill for the enRoNC. Bill Schnieder on CNN yesterday, claiming AQ wants the Shrub defeated:
SCHNEIDER: Well, I can guarantee you, they don't like George Bush. Do they think there's a difference? I think Osama bin Laden, the Al Qaeda network, who I am certain follow American politics, look at the messages coming out on their tapes. They seem to follow politics very closely. They would very much like to defeat President Bush. But the question is: Can they pull off the same trick that they pulled off in Spain? What Dennis Hastert said is, "They'd better not try that. It won't work here." And my guess is, he's right about that.
Edit a tape to make it seem like your opponent is not bigoted enough, then distance yourself:
Mr. Bush, while missing months of the Guard duty that allowed him to avoid Vietnam, was the political director of the Blount campaign, which accused Mr. Sparkman - a hawk on the war - and the national Democrats of supporting "amnesty for all draft dodgers" and of showing "more concern for coddling deserters than for patriotic American young men who have lost their lives in Vietnam." In the last week of the race, the Blount campaign ran a radio advertisement using an edited recording of Mr. Sparkman that made him appear to support forced busing of schoolchildren, which he opposed.
Although campaign records list Mr. Bush as third in command, people who worked in the race said he was not involved in those tactics or with the overall agenda.
Sunday, September 19, 2004
The Smirking Shirker says "There are a lot of questions and they need to be answered," about the CBS memos. It's completely obscene and we cannot improve on the way So Far So Left views it.
Pretentious jack asses. Thru Seeing the Forest, where Johnson went way too easy on them.
Through Incoming Signals, a magnificent essay comparing George W. Bush to the gardener, the Chance character, in the movie Being There. We'd read this a while ago and forgotten to post it. Bush is a simulacrum:
While in public, Bush appears to interact amiably with the media, in the center of government -- away from public observation -- he is disconnected, like an unplugged machine. At a January 30, 2001, meeting with the National Security Council, O'Neill remembers, "the president said little. He just nodded, with that same flat, unquestioning demeanor that O'Neill was familiar with." Behind closed doors, Bush no longer connects or exists. His principal function has been lost. In this respect he is like an expensive, hand-waxed automobile, gleaming in the darkness of a garage. The car is intended for rapid motion and for public display. When its owner-driver is at the dinner table, he has no need of the car. "The celebrity displays personality," explains Michael Rogin. "He pleases others; intimate before the mass audience, he plays at privacy in public. Neither a repressed interior nor an intractable reality exercise claims over the celebrity for he exists in the eye of the beholder." If Bush "plays at privacy" in public, he cannot act "for real" in private, because he is now in a realm where substance and depth, rather than sheer surface, are called upon.
The rage caused by this apologetic shrug of an article in The New York Times is exceded only by the rage caused by the facts it conveys:
The group gave grades of F to several states - including Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware and Tennessee - based on their degree of reliance on paperless electronic voting. Florida, whose results will almost certainly receive intense scrutiny, received an F-plus, while Georgia was given an F-minus. New Mexico, a swing state that will rely heavily on touch-screen voting on Nov. 2, received a D-minus. ...
... While it is too late in the game to make it possible to produce a paper record for each vote on every machine already deployed, Mr. Miller said that vendors would be willing to include that feature in the future if the market demanded it. Most of the major vendors have models that can supply a printed record, but in most cases, Mr. Miller said, election officials have not required it.
Paper receipts are not automatically required because no such universal guideline has ever existed. Mechanical lever machines, for instance, which have been in widespread use since the 1930's - and will still be used by millions of voters this year - have never produced a paper record of each vote. And states have traditionally established their own definitions of what constitutes a ballot.
He is a lawyer and he is suing the Cartel for orchestrating 9/11. It's an Alex Jones interview and, ya know, it's Alex Jones, but ... way scary. Thru Skippy.
Bring on the show trial distraction, Allawi (who broke his hand recently by pounding on his desk in anger) was evidently told, because Kobe walked and Jackson/Peterson isn't enough:
Allawi, 59, said the trial would open ``definitely in October,'' and Hussein might appear in November or December. Asked if Hussein's verdict might be death, Allawi said: ``Well, the death penalty has been restored in Iraq.''
Allawi rejected repeated suggestions by ABC interviewer George Stephanopoulos that insurgents in Iraq have gained strength. The insurgency is ``not getting stronger, it's getting more desperate,'' he said. ``We are squeezing out the insurgency.''
"The idea that we're going to have an Iraqi force trained to defeat an enemy we can't defeat stretches the imagination."
We thought the ourageous enRoNC flier being sent around West Virginia required a crude response:
It seems Proctor and Gamble decided to throw some money behind some gay rights in Cincinnati (one of our least favorite bastions of insanity) so a bunch of "family" groups have called for a write-in and boycott movement.
We liked this confirmation email from the family group's routing site used to heckle P & G:
Thank you for using Focus on the Family Mail System Message sent to the following recipients: Robert StoreyA.G. LafleyErnesto Zedillo Message text follows:
Stockton Tweed
September 17, 2004[
Stand by your guns and don't let these assholes intimidate you. I'm changing to Tide and Crest.Sincerely,
Stockton & Tweed
Raven
Rebecca Dixen, a St. Paul reference librarian and a Kerry supporter, said she had come to the fair hoping to get into the vice president's town hall event and ask him a question, unaware that it was by invitation only and there are never, ever any rude or discomfiting questions. "You can't even get in unless you already support him," she said. "I don't know what kind of democracy that is. To tell you the truth, it's a little bit disappointing."
Saturday, September 18, 2004
We should have done this long ago. Here is an email list of media outlets we got from here, somewhere. Easy to cut and paste for typing truth to power.
Afterhours@foxnews.com, AMitchell@MSNBC.com, atc@npr.org, Colmes@foxnews.com, Comments@foxnews.com, Dayside@foxnews.com, DShuster@msnbc.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, editor@usatoday.com, evening@cbsnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, FirstRead@MSNBC.com, FNS@foxnews.com, Foxmagazine@foxnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, hardball@msnbc.com, Hardblogger@MSNBC.com, JTrippi@MSNBC.com, KOlbermann@MSNBC.com, letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, letters@washpost.com, Lisa.M.Todorovich@abc.com, morning@npr.org, netaudr@abc.com, newshour@pbs.org, Newswatch@foxnews.com, nightly@nbc.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, ombudsman@washpost.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com, oreilly@foxnews.com, politicalunit@abcnews.com, RReagan@MSNBC.com, Special@foxnews.com, tips@upi.com, today@nbc.com, totn@npr.org, Viewerservices@foxnews.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com
Always read Froomkin:
"Bush was peppy when he popped into the Brick House Deli in Anoka, mugged for cameras with owner Angel Howell's 8-month-old daughter, Kate Lynn, and ordered an egg salad sandwich. 'Fire one up,' he said. He settled for chicken salad when he was told egg salad wasn't on the menu."
We warned about the upcoming speech to Congress by the Iraq PM Allawi. The Fantasy World Cartel will try to get Dems to applaud for big fat lies. They had better not. Daschle will, he's just that way.
Here was Bush yesterday, getting his rooffies ready.
These people are indiscriminately killing because they want to cause us to leave, and they want the Iraqis to grow weary of trying to be a free society. Listen to Allawi. He'll talk about what it means to be free."Listen to Allawi," says the Shirking Smirker. "Don't listen to me, I've got zero credibility ... you know you want it ... no means yes ..."
He moved right on to his new version of assessing Iraq. It's easy to see how the slight variation is supposed to add credibility, by admitting that things are neither stable nor Democratic, ahem, yet. The Shrub went farther, without anyone noticing, apparently, and suddenly admitted that we are not yet even on the path to stability and democracy.
Once we get these folks trained and get them on the path to stability and democracy, our troops are coming home, with the honor they earned.Of course, if Bush's words mean anything, which they never do, once Iraqis are "on the path," forget about actual stability or democracy, we can then "cut and run."
If it passes and survives legal challenges, the nine electoral votes split 5-4. Earlier this year, Bush had a good lock on the state but now it is very close and Colorado Dems may be playing with fire.
It seems the average person likes the idea but the GOP hacks will put a stop to that:
[A GOP spokeman] said the most recent private polls he saw showed that the initiative had majority support, but he added that was the situation before Owens and others began mounting an active campaign against it.Also, some hints at legal arguments (Wampum take note) that sound plausible under Colorado law:
Proponents cite recent Colorado Supreme Court and U.S. Supreme Court decisions that found that the people have the right to draw new legislative districts, even though the Constitution specifically gives that power to the state legislature, because the legislature ceded part of its authority to the people by allowing direct voter initiatives.
Bush 50 Kerry 42 Und 7 (Reg. voters) --- we would prefer to see Bush at 48 or lower, because undecideds break 4 to 1 for the challenger. 15% chose but say they are still unsure (persuadables).
The more you read the details, the less it means. One thing that is always striking is the number of "desert island" answers, meaning the number of people who admit to knowing nothing. You really have to at least double that number because people don't like to declare themselves ignorant.
Rove and Fox, et al have turned most losses into ties. On many issues where Bush should be getting killed, it's a wash.
Some clear ends of the spectrum and maybe a few surprising answers (in NYT pdf graphic):
20% liberal, 40% conservative (33 Rep, 31 Dem, 29 Ind)
79% white
31% born-again or evangelical Christians
61% Bush will win (thank you liberal media)
63% Kerry says what he thinks people want to hear instead of what he believes
18% jobs have increased in their community
20% Bush has increased jobs in America
11% Bush policies decreased Rx drug costs
6% taxes will go down if Kerry elected
4% things going "very well" in Iraq (42% "somewhat well," arrggg)
18% say Swifty liars speak for most vets
44% say Bush did not win legitimately (51 - did)
32% DID NOT VOTE in 2000
The real annoyance, about the administration's reaction to a report of a mushroom cloud, was that they were so quick to deny nuke activity in North Korea but so eager to declare nuke activity in Iraq. We still reject Powell and his lying lies but ...
Video of the area where North Korea said a huge explosion had occurred last week showed dozens of workers swarming around a construction site resembling a large dam project, while a foreign diplomat who visited the site said Friday that he had found no sign that the blast was nuclear.
Friday, September 17, 2004
The "mighty" Minority Senate Leader Tom Daschle (D?) is fighting off a challenge to his Senate Seat in South Dakota. He is now running an ad featuring the image of him hugging George W. Bush. So, ask yourselves, how blindly partisan are you?
Damfacrats can't stomch this. We laid off Daschle after Kennedy wrote a letter to Buzzflash but this is unbearable. Daschle will lose and we don't just care anymore.
At the Sludger.
You know what that means. It's document dump time.
The Pentagon was orderd by a federal judge to release all Bush AWOL documents that it could find. Miraculously, after the Cartel said that everything was released (in the 90's, in 2000, in 2003, in February 04, Summer 04 and last week, basically) they have more to show us.
Still, they look pretty happy-face, so it's very odd that they were withheld. Very odd.
In addition to the letter from Bush's father, the latest documents contain news releases that the Texas Air National Guard sent to Houston newspapers in 1970 about young Bush, then a second lieutenant and new pilot. "George Bush is one member of the younger generation who doesn't get his kicks from pot or hashish or speed," the news release said. "Oh, he gets high, all right, but not from narcotics."
Quoted in full:
Newsweek poll: "Do you think Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq was DIRECTLY involved in planning, financing, or carrying out the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, or not?"
Taken Sept. 2-4. "Yes"=42% "No"=44% "Unsure"=14%
That "DIRECTLY" was capitalized by the pollsters...not me. And they STILL got that disturbing result. I can't think of a bigger indictment of the irresponsible, incompetent whore media than this poll.
This is a Damfacratic conundrum. Attack the darling McCain or defend the heroic Nader? Both positions always oppose the weakling Dem memes of kissing McCain's ass and thrashing Nader.
"These obstacles discourage public participation in elections by denying voters the right to vote for their preferred candidate. Keeping Nader off the ballot in the hope that his voters will be forced to support another candidate is patently unfair to those Floridians who, for whatever reason, have decided he's their man," McCain said.
First of all, what business does McCain have with Florida elections? What right does he have to judge the law in Florida or make any comment whatsoever? McCain ought to shut the hell up about it.
Having said that, the key with Nader is for Democrats to also shut up about him. The question of whether he runs should be ignored, for strategic reasons and in recognition of reality.
In what world does it make the Dems look stronger when they run around terrified of a guy getting between 0-5% in a handful of states? That's the strategic side. The line should be: we don't care if Nader runs because Kerry will win by a lot. A friend compared it accurately to a sports game where a blown call by the ref or ump affects the outcome in the last minute. No team can complain, because they should have a big enough lead to overcome a blown call.
On to reality. Reality tells us that anyone who would hang on to Nader would definitely vote for Cobb, the Green Party guy, who is on the ballot in like thirty states. Get rid of Nader and you still have Cobb, so what is the concern?
What will be will be, and if the law in Florida keeps Nader off the ballot, so be it - nothing unfair about that.
Left Coaster finds that Gallup has been using a 40% GOP base for its polls, with only 33% Democrat. This was the same problem with the Time poll. No wonder it is so wildly out of sync with the other polls. What the hell is Gallup thinking?
Reader THB calls attention to Iraq veteran Jon Soltz's arguments on PBS last night. He did a great job of telling the truth. Excerpt:
JON SOLTZ: If John Kerry is a traitor, then so am I. John Kerry fought for his right to come home and question his war in Vietnam; 12,000 Americans died after he testified in the senate. And I fought for my right to question this president's policies in Iraq.
It was a dark day for me when I had to go to the hospital in Germany to see one of my soldiers who was blown up. For the first time in my life, you know, I cried in uniform. I had to look at this guy and I had to say to him, you know, "I hope that this is worth it."
The fact of the matter is this administration is not being truthful with the war in Iraq. They've continually tried to tie it to al-Qaida. We've committed 85 percent of our ground army. Soldiers like me have died for weapons we can't find.
And they let Osama bin Laden run around in Afghanistan with zero of our ten military divisions not allocated to that. They failed us. They failed our soldiers. They failed our men and women in uniform.
Unbelieveable. First, Bush resists giving budgetary authority to the new 9/11 panel recommended Nat'l Intel Director.
In particular, Bush's blueprint would give the new director authority to coordinate the budgets of the nation's 15 intelligence agencies, as the current director has, but not the final say on how much they receive or how they spend it.
"In this city, if you have a fancy title, but you're not in the chain of command, and you don't control the budget, you're a figurehead," Kerrey said in arguing for giving the director budget powers. (Aug 4)
Then he loudly proclaims that he will follow the 9/11 panel prompt and give authority.
An administration official said Bush will discuss with congressional leaders his support of "a single appropriation for the entire intelligence budget directed at the NID level." (Sep. 8)
Today, the GOP House gets the White House legislation model and it totally hamstrings the budget authority of the NID.
The intelligence director would control agencies under the National Foreign Intelligence Program but would only "participate" in setting military agency budgets.
The director also would lack complete control over the nonmilitary agencies, holding only "guidance for developing the NFIP budgets," the White House bill proposes.
The legislation also says the director would have to get White House approval to transfer money. The intelligence director would "have the authority to transfer or reprogram NFIP funds among appropriations available for the NFIP, as necessary, with the approval of the director of the Office of Management and Budget," the bill said.
While yesterday's news seemed "legitimately" focused on the "revelations" found in the CIA report, that Iraq is totally FUBAR, today is a rehab day for Bush. The telescreen appears to be far more interested in Ivan today, despite its dissipation, and, for example, CNN's Miles O'Brien seems obsessed with some escaped alligators. CBS is still taking a beating. CBS ought to stick a hot poker in the face of Fox News.
A new Gallup poll says Bush is ahead by double digits nationally, way ahead in Wisconsin (gulp) and tied in Minnesota. This painful news is soothed by the following:
- Breslin notes that pollsters never call the 186 million cell phones in this country (thru EVP).
- A new poll shows Kerry and Bush tied in Ohio, knocking back a widening Bush lead.
- Four national polls released yesterday showed Kerry and Bush tied.
- Kerry is talking about Halliburton.
Paula Zahn. She just loves having ultra-extreme right wing guests on her show. Too bad for this CNN swee'pea, O'Reilly is killing her in the ratings anyway.
ZAHN: (To Gov. Dean) But do you not concede that John Kerry bears some of the responsibility for these numbers because of all of the flip-flops that have been pointed out by the Republicans and even some Democrats concur with?
Right out of the enRoNC playbook. Last night she welcomed G. Gordon Liddy. Her brain is so tiny, she probably does not even know that he did four years for orchestrating crimes on behalf of Nixon. She is certainly too stupid to understand irony.
LIDDY: Secondly, with respect to the lovely 86-year-old woman, she is an anti-Bush partisan who has said, "Bush was selected, not elected." I hardly think that she is a credible witness on this.
Thursday, September 16, 2004
Gaze at these beautiful photographs recommended by Incoming Signals.
"Machu Pichu."
Also at I.S., the big map of "Springfield" and the most fitting blog tribute we've seen.
As is well-known among the bloggers, Tony Blair is refusing to show up to collect some medal that the Shirker wants to give him, so we at least won't see the same trick played using Blair, as we did last year. Instead, we get the interim Iraqi Prime Minister.
When this CIA/Saddam puppet arrives, the Shirker campaign will be trying to force a lot of bipartisan standing ovations for him. The translation will be a soothing ovation for the misadventure in Iraq.
If Democrats fall for this, they don't want to win badly enough. They need to either refuse to show, heckle him or at least remain seated on their hands. Please. Don't let the GOP date-rape you again.
A few feet from shattering the Bush myth of progress in Afghanistan. Maybe one of the little girls going to school or flying kites for the first time saved him. Thru Left Coaster, the Washington Post:
KABUL, Afghanistan, Sept. 16 -- Afghan President Hamid Karzai escaped an apparent assassination attempt Thursday when a rocket was fired at his helicopter as he was about to land in a provincial capital. The [Taliban acredited] attack caused no injuries or damage, but forced Karzai to cancel his first trip outside of Kabul since he began campaigning for presidential elections to be held Oct. 9.
Officials and witnesses said the rocket flew over a crowd of several hundred people waiting to greet Karzai near the town of Gardez, about 80 miles south of Kabul. The president's helicopter was about to land, but instead immediately returned to Kabul without touching the ground.
Who would have imagined? This little call by Cox and forty other GOP House members is reminicient of their embarrassing proposal to replace FDR with Reagan on the dime - which Nancy rejected.
California Representative Chris Cox wrote to Michigan's Fred Upton, the chair of the House subcommittee on telecommunications asking him to, quote, "commence a subcommittee investigation into the continued use by CBS News of apparently forged documents concerning the service record of President George W. Bush intended to unfairly damage his reputation and influence the outcome of the 2004 presidential election." ...
... Congressman Upton's group is a subcommittee in the House energy and commerce committee which is now chaired by Texas Republican Joe Barton who is not happy. After a response that amounted to telling Cox to mind his own committee, Barton added, "a news organization's responsibility is to fact and truth but the oversight of network news generally is a matter best sorted out by the viewing public and the news media. It seems clear that the press and the two presidential campaigns are properly dealing with that issue."
Yes. Way to use a Rove tactic. Imply your opponent's position and trash it.
"There will be no draft when John Kerry is president," Edwards said, a statement that drew a standing ovation.
We're the Damfacrats and we approve this message:
"You deserve a president who will not play politics with national security, who will not ignore his own intelligence while living in a fantasy world of spin, and who will give the American people the truth about the challenge our brave men and women face on the front lines," the Democratic senator said.
Debbie Norville seemed to be interested in the question. Unfortunately, the interviewee was somewhat evasive and it seemed the concept of global warming is not his favorite. We sensed a straw man:
DN: Dr. Gray, let me start with you first. Are there more hurricanes this season than usual?DR. WILLIAM GRAY, CLIMATE RESEARCHER: Sure. There's more this year, but we've had other years with nearly this number, too. And look, for instance 1995 had as many early season storms at this time, and other years, 1950, 1955 did. The most of the seasons, eight of the nine, ten seasons since 1995 have been very active, including this one. Now, it's not the activity this year, although it's much above average.
But in keeping with the typical year since 1995, what's different about this year, it's an active year and the surrounding storm steering currents are driving these storms to the coastline.
So, there are more hurricanes, yes, but what is unusual is that they are on a merry-go-round with the U.S. in the path. Global warming? Oh no, no, no, no, let's not get silly, he volunteers:
Now, I want to emphasize, we've had a lot of storms this year. But there have been other years that have had almost as many and this is natural changes.
Natural changes. Ah. Without even being asked. Well, that's a relief ...? In case you missed the message:
GRAY: Now, one other comment I would like to make very much, there will be a lot of people thinking, oh, gee, there's all these land-falling storms this year. Does that mean humans are changing the climate, and we're the cause of it? And the answer is undoubtedly no.
NORVILLE: All right. I'm going to let that be the final word.
So did MSNBC pick this guy because his mind is open about global warming? Let's see:
Oct., 1998: Global Warming/Hurricane Link Debunked -- The Cooler Heads coalition sponsored a science briefing for media and congressional staff on October 9, featuring Dr. William Gray, professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University. Gray, the foremost expert on hurricanes in the U.S., spoke about the link between global warming and hurricanes.
Nov. 1999: "Researchers pound the global-warming drum because they know there is politics and, therefore, money behind it. . . I've been critical of global warming and am persona non grata." - Gray
1999: "However, Gray isn't committed to the notion that the global warming trend necessarily spawns more hurricanes."
July, 2000: While [Gray's] views are not always politically popular (he is hardly convinced that global warming presents long term dangers) its hard not to admire his passion and commitment to the changing field of meteorology.
Nov., 2000: "Human kind has little or nothing to do with the recent temperature changes. We are not that influential." - Gray
Sep 10, 2004, Fox News: "It's been a disappointing summer for global warming alarmists. ... private expert William Gray and others found distinct patterns of low-activity hurricane periods and high-activity periods, each of which endured for decades. These patterns, unrelated to the current concern over global warming, are caused by regular cycles of oceanic and atmospheric phenomena, such as unusually warm water in hurricane breeding grounds."
Can you spot any more examples of human climate change denial by this man? Google lists ... hmmm ... 74,000 search results ...
Carl Bernstein (as in Woodward &) on Olbermann's show:
We have had now for weeks and weeks and weeks, an awful, dirty, thugish debate about the two candidates for president. And there are some very simple facts. One is, that one candidate was a hero. He went to war. He volunteered. He went to war. He served bravely. He got shot. He came home.
The other candidate was a shirker. And there's nothing wrong with that. You know, there were millions and millions of American young men who were shirkers. I was in the guard myself. I didn't to go Vietnam. I didn't want to go to Vietnam. But he was a shirker, and that's clear.
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
Here's the transcript. Imus was pretty tough on him, especially considering that Imus openly endorses Kerry. Kerry was OK. This part was kind of funny:
IMUS: Wouldn't it have been funny if he'd've showed up for that speech yesterday, that National Guard speech— the president went up there and gave that dopey salute like you did and said, "Reporting for duty, finally"? (LAUGHTER)
KERRY: Yes, actually it would have been funny.
IMUS: Or just not shown up at all, that would actually have been more amusing. But those guys don't have a sense of humor.
This part, on the Swifty book, was really clear:
KERRY: Look, it's a pack of lies. It's an absolute pack of lies. It's been proven to be a pack of lies, and I have no interest in reading it. ...
On his anti-war testimony, solid, with an apology, in a way:
KERRY: I had the courage to stand up -- look, I went, I did my duty, I came back, I saw what I saw, and I told the truth. If some people have trouble with that still, I'm sorry about it.
You can feel the weight of despair and anger all over the blogosphere. You can see it in the increase of profanity on this blog.
Some of the blog leaders have been calling for the game face and, to some extent, whistling in the dark. The most crushing source of hopelessness eminates from the irrelevance of fact. It's not so much that Kerry isn't saying the right things, it's that nothing he could say would make a difference. The election is rigged for Bush, in so many ways, and it always has been.
So, while there may be nothing we can do to stop the freight train of injustice carrying us into November, we can at least call up as many positives as possible.
1. New Annenberg Poll - Some Bush numbers among persuadable voters worsened since the convention:
Approval - From 56 to 44
Economy Disapproval - From 54 to 63
Approval Iraq - 42 to 34
Has Clear Iraq Plan - 30 to 17
Out of Touch - 35 to 48
Stubborn - 47 to 61
2. The Bush Boy is probably at his peak. One mainstream national poll seems to show the recent bounce fading fast:
Newsweek - 11 point lead to 5 point lead
3. In many ways, Labor Day marks the beginning of the campaign. Kerry may have been leading slightly until then because those with any opinion are generally more informed. Now that the "newbies" are tuning in, the first inclination is to support the incumbent. However, as more of these people do some learning and listening, things should turn worse for Dubya. The main problem for Kerry is that people simply don't know the truth. Yet.
4. Nobody with any information honestly believes Iraq is going well and no expert believes it has decreased the threat of terrorism. even the GOP lie-machine can no longer paint a rosy picture. They can only provide excuses for the "temporary" violence, as they always have (in order: dead-enders, too much American success, slow infrastructure rehab, Saddam's sons, Saddam, Saddam's capture, transfer of power, upcoming elections).
5. Kitty Kelley's book is the kind of thing a non-wonk America can absorb. It's also the kind of thing that can damage Dubya among the churchers. The Swifty book sank to #7 recently.
6. The debates are still there and the Shrub is much more in danger of a massive gaffe than is Kerry. That said, Kerry will have to anticipate the right Shrub tactics and make sure he ridicules them properly. He needs to call Bush out when Bush smirks at the wrong times: "What's so funny about Iraq, Mr. President?"
7. Kerry is a closer. He always plays his best game at clutch moments. He is objectively the better man.
8. Every poll leaves room for the undecided voters. Most are at least 5% undecided, with some as high as 10%. Historically, undecideds break against the incumbent, four to one. This means that in a large majority of state polls where Bush has less than 49%, he will lose.
9. Democrats must have a few aces up their sleeves. Any smart campaign would wait until October to really drop a bomb (excuse link). Let's hope it's on an audio or video tape because that seems to be the only thing the media accepts as proof. Everything else is "critics of Bush claim ... ," no matter how iron-clad.
10. Getting Out the Vote - Everyone agrees that the Dems are better organized than ever before. Young voters will be turning out in much greater numbers. African-Americans will be turning out as revenge for Florida. Diehard Nader/Green voters are seeing the light in close-call states.
One poll, from the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, showed Democrat John Kerry leading Bush in the state, 47 percent to 41 percent, with independent Ralph Nader at 4 percent. But that was narrowed from a pre-Republican National Convention poll from Quinnipiac released Aug. 13 that had Kerry leading Bush, 53 percent to 35 percent, with Nader also at 4 percent. ...
... "The president's approval rating has gone from terrible (37) to just bad (43)," Carroll added.
Even for the one who only encouraged it. What will Bush get for spitting on America?
LUFKIN, Texas (AP) -- Two young men face felony charges after one of them allegedly spat in a drink he was serving to an East Texas police officer.
Brian Strban, 19, and Nathaniel Allen Baker, 22, were workers at a Lufkin Sonic Drive-In where the incident allegedly happened Sept. 3, according to a police affidavit.
Both were arrested last week and charged with second-degree felony tampering with a consumer product. If convicted, both could be sentenced to 20 years in prison and fined up to $10,000 ...
... According to the affidavit, the officer ordered a soft drink, but when he received the beverage he noticed several workers inside the kitchen laughing. The police officer, who was not identified, opened the drink and noticed what appeared to be phlegm floating on the surface.
Here we go again. All Ivan All the Time. Then there will be Jeanne.
For a couple of years now, we have been baffled by national weather coverage. Can anyone explain why the national telescreen channels report the weather? Isn't weather an inherently local story? Sure, a hurricane is more than weather, and our best wishes go out to people in its path, but how much coverage is really necessary?
CNN World News on CNNfn even has world weather reports.
The weather, as a topic, is annoying in any context. It is the quintessential non-topic, passed between strangers on an elevator and obsessed over by sub-intelligent office workers. The weather is boring, cliched, obvious, uncontrollable and insignificant - perfect for the telescreen when it's less than fifty days until the election.
Kerry is getting to it:
"His is the excuse presidency -- never wrong, never responsible, never to blame ... no, it's not our fault; no, there's nothing wrong; no, we can't do better; no, we haven't made a single mistake," Kerry said. (thru Bflash)
And today, when I called Republicans on capitol hill to read them the quote, several of them suggested, "he (Cheney) couldn't possibly have said that." Well, we've double checked the transcripts... and he did.
Talking about European nations and the war on terror, Cheney said, and I quote: "I think some have hoped that if they kept their heads down and stayed out of the line of fire, they wouldn't get hit. I think what happened in Russia now demonstrates pretty conclusively that everybody is a target. That Russia, of course, didn't support us in Iraq, they didn't get involved in sending troops there, they've gotten hit anyway."
Today, Preznit Squirrel Face will spend his first full day in Washington since August 2nd. 44 days straight days on the road.
Since Memorial Day, he has spent only 10 full days in Washington. This guy is useless.
We don't normally like to use insulting terms that are specific to women. It's sexist to call prime time telescreen women such as Paula Zahn things like an "evil cuntbag 2-dollar whore." So we will refrain. After all, she is probably just mad that she is nowhere near as hot as Ana Marie Cox, AKA Wonkette.
Here's how her show opened tonight:
PAULA ZAHN, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening and welcome. Thanks so much for being with us tonight on PRIME TIME POLITICS. Who represents African-Americans better, George W. Bush or John Kerry? It's turning into a hot debate.She even said "whole nuther," which is always annoying, but the transcript cleaned it for her:
ZAHN: That is a whole 'another subject that we'll get off on another time.The show got worse, eventually featuring Glenn "no official party ties" Reynolds and Bob Johnson, spokesman for Free Republic, a site so vile that even the Damfacrats won't link to it.
This woman is the most plastic, ugly-hearted money-grabbing demon-faced government mouthpiece imaginable.
With an older woman named Kitty Kelley. Sigh.
In one of the creepier passages of the book, a family gathering from hell at Kennebunkport, Maine, Barbara is shown mercilessly baiting her dry-drunk son, then governor of Texas, as a teetotalling 'Chosen One', while he keeps pleading to skip the cocktails and put on the feed bag, and his elderly father "drools over [TV newswoman] Paula Zahn's legs".
One of the major themes in Kelley's book is the family's weakness for liquor and drugs. Alcoholism, she writes, runs deeply in the family and among its victims, according to one Bush family friend, was Prescott, a "major-league alcoholic", who was in the habit of checking himself into his men's club and country club to go on benders. And Kelley writes that George W Bush is not the only one in the first family who enjoyed illegal substances. While a student at Southern Methodist University in the 1960s, first lady Laura Bush was known "as a go-to girl for dime bags of marijuana". ...
... [S:] And you believe the Bushes are capable of doing something like that - of threatening a woman who is shooting her mouth off like that? You think the family really operates that way?
[KK:] I know the family operates that way. I wish you could see the stuff that's on the cutting room floor, that got left out of the book. There are other people who will tell you stories like that, but they won't go on the record. And you can't blame them.
Damn.
Dante Zappala said, "My brother died trying to make an honest man of George Bush, hoping to find those illusive weapons of mass destruction. I don't blame George Bush for his death. But I do believe that our President was careless with his responsibility to our troops. He has not supported our troops, but has used them to satisfy a very reckless agenda."
Zappala said that people have tried to comfort him by saying that his brother was trying to make the world a safer place. But he says instead Sergeant Sherwood Baker died in vain.
The National Guard families also said that their loved ones were told to buy their own radios, GPS systems and often their own flak jackets before going to Iraq. There are 1,700 members of the group Military Guard Families Speak Out . They say they are all supported by their National Guard family members, but say the soldiers cannot speak out against the war without facing retribution.
Keith Olbermann has the guts to wonder about these things:
So that's the question. Would anybody really have the guts, Democrats, Republicans, whoever, to create a news story that would on the face of it, damage their own candidate just so that the story could be knocked down and would the knocking down of the story actually help in this case, the Bush campaign?We think the answer is in this theory somewhere.
While there are some reasons to think that these memos are authentic, the weight of the evidence seems to be that they are faked. Their basic content has already been confirmed by various other witnesses and documents but something really fancy may be happening here.
We were less willing to embrace the possibility that a GOP operative planted the memos until we heard Storybook Laurie's comments, suggesting that everything negative you hear about Bush can simply be ignored as untrue (as in, Kitty Kelly's book):
"You know, (the documents) probably are altered and they probably are forgeries and I think that's terrible, really," Mrs. Bush said, adding that this latest campaign flap is not that surprising. "That's actually one of the risks you take when you run for public office or when you're in the public eye for any reason and that's that obviously a lot of things are said about you that aren't true and that' the drawback, that's the one thing that's not great about serving in public office."
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
Raven
It's also the wrong message. The right message is something like this: Yo, swing voters Yo, swing voters, you entrusted the American government to compassionate conservatives and instead got reckless extremists. Bush has lost jobs, harmed the environment, tricked us into war, taken away basic liberties, enriched cronies, antagonized the world and stretched the military too thin to battle Al Qaeda -- only to create vast safe havens for new terrorists in "liberated" Iraq. And these bunglers want four more years?
While the progressive blogs have been tearing apart Cartel lies for the past 3 1/2 years, the telescreen has ignored them and carried forth its constant stupidity. Suddenly, when some wingnut blogs start questioning the CBS Bush Nat'l Guard memos, its all over the telescreen, including today's vomitous exchange between Blitzer and Howie Kurtz.
Doonesbury's Gary Trudeau has been running a $10,000 reward for months, for anyone who can prove Bush served in Alabama, but that is not mentioned when a new $50,000 reward is offered for the same thing.
The telescreen will rally to protect the Bush Crime Family from Kitty Kelley's book but maniacally project the Swifty Liars claims.
It runs endless hurricane coverage without ever exploring global climate change.
The question about Iraq is never whether we should punish Georgie Boy for taking us there. It is always the question of how Kerry will fix all the problems the Boy created.
Smiles when reporting Bush leading in a poll. Smiles quickly after reporting scores of people injured and killed in the latest Iraq carbomb.
Bring up MoveOn in hushed and troubled tones.
Always expose the tactics of the Kerry campaign, pull back the curtain and don't let the voters be manipulated.
Never run an accusation against Bush without ending the report with the RNC spin defense.
Always, always, always run idiotic internet polls.
Never, ever call a Bush ad lie anything worse than "somewhat factually inaccurate."
Everyone seems to agree that Kerry needs to be on the offensive. Let's suggest the criteria for what the attacks should be:
1. "New" - The "more jobs since Hoover" thing isn't working, apparently. Nor is the "misled into war" thing. The Swifty smears worked because they were "new," in the sense that most voters had not heard about that stuff. Kerry needs to pick attacks that will ring fresh, shock and prompt media scrutiny.
2. "Indefensible" - While the RNC tries to at least make it a tie when they are pinned to the wall, there are some things that cannot be defended well, or at all. Like Maher said last night, the 9/11 Pet Goat thing leaves them pretty tongue-tied. That one isn't "new" (see #1) but it is abhorrent enough to warrant more repetition.
3. "Constant" - Kerry needs to make some real noise by changing his style and presentation. He needs to start, end and pepper his appearances with a specific list of attacks that is short yet incendiary. If he draws attention to his "method," the media will actually cover it because it transcends substance.
4. "Personal" - We've discussed this before. Americans aren't wonks. Spoonfeed the easy stuff.
5. "Anti-strength" - Along with #4, when substance is brought to bear, it needs to dig into the established falsehoods about the Shrub, particularly his perceived a) leadership, b) consistency and c) defense/security mastery.
6. "Anti-war" - It seems clear that Kerry is better off "flipping" on the war than attempting to maintain his middle ground approach. The message needs to be "no, I would never have voted for the authority if I knew how badly Bush would dick up the war and Bush should be punished for his incompetency."
7. "Renaming" - It is crucial that Kerry reject the words of the RNC and re-label everything.
With these criteria in mind, let's move to substance of the attacks which will fit the above criteria, not necessarily in order of effectiveness:
1. Cocaine - It's hot right now.
2. My Pet Goat - Even Hannity has admitted that he wished Georgie had acted.
3. 9/11 Air Quality - Ties in lies, corporate pandering and the Big Day.
4. Flag scribbling - Unless Kerry has done it too, have him hold up the photo that is at the top of this blog.
5. "Saw the first plane hit" - No one knows about this insane lie and it can't be excued by "misspeaking" because he said it more than once.
6. No funerals attended, no photos of Dover - Dubya does not care about the troops and wants to hide their sacrifice from America.
7. Medicare lie about costs - Any time there is proof that the Cartel lied to its own party, it packs a punch. Throw in the fake news reports, called illegal propaganda by the GAO.
8. Bring em On - Can't bring that up too often.
9. Illegal Immigration - This is an example of where Kerry can come down to the right of Bush, perhaps. We guess that the number of people who would be turned away is much less than the number of people who would be shocked by the Preznit's coddling on behalf of Big Business. Remember, nobody on the right liked Bush's proposals and almost all openly blasted him for it.
10. Media Conglomeration - All the polls showed that Amercians are against it. Demonize the corporate cronies. Use it.
As usual, these are just off-the-cuff ideas, but there are many more. The absolute key is to raise under-covered stories that the media will be forced to revisit. It's all about breaking the Bush spell - once the veil is lifted, Bush is doubted, and his true shape can be witnessed.
The blastfax for this week has all the media poodles twittering to suppress the Kitty Kelly book's charge that Bush used cocaine at Camp David during H's presidency. Some outlets have cancelled interviews with the author and cancelled articles, despite their leg-humping of the Swifty Liars.
When President Sugarcoat was questioned repeatedly about his coke use during campaigns in the 90's, he flip-flopped around about how many years had passed without a snort and never denied it. Check out all the headlines from back then.
Paticularly good today: "If Senator John Kerry really has advisers telling him not to attack Mr. Bush on national security, he should dump them. When Dick Cheney is saying vote Bush or die, responding with speeches about jobs and health care doesn't cut it."
Bill Maher was great on Larry King. He's simply honest and smart, not a partisan. Great, until right at the end:
KING: But who now? Who in America would you like to see president of the United States?Idiotic thing to say. Kind of like David Brancaccio, a few weeks ago on Now with Bill Moyers, during a segment where he was examining Bush's illegal and offensive Olympics ad:
MAHER: You know I've always been a fan of Colin Powell. You know that. I think he's a terrific choice but I don't think that's ever going to happen.
BRANCACCIO: I've seen it five times. I'm still getting choked up by this one.Can he have been serious? Foolish.
Then, of course, there are those times when evil people say dumb things, which is all the time, these days:
DOBBS: Senator Craig, representing, as you do, the State of Idaho, a state committed to the outdoors, to the environment, hunting is a big part of the outdoor activities in Idaho. Do you support assault weapons not being banned, if I can put that way, because of your interest in hunting and sportsmanship?
CRAIG: It's a combination of a lot of things, but, first and foremost, Lou, let me say that the assault weapon is not the weapon of choice of terrorists. Last I checked, nearly 3,000 Americans died, and the weapon of choice was a fully-loaded airliner.
So we don't know what terrorists use. They don't use these kinds of weapons in this country. If they chose to, they could buy them off the black market and out of the back streets of America, but darn few of them are available there, simply put.
This is really cool. Probably not news to many but Al Franken's show is on Sundance. It even features graphics that follow the discussion, like, in regard to Bush's August 6, 2001, PDB, which did not prevent Bush from entering the classroom even after learning of the first attack the graphic flashed something like: "Two choices: A) Didn't read it B) just stupid."
Also cool: constant Garcia guitar interludes and the Terrapin Station jam blasting away over the closing credits.
Even cooler: Sundance is running "Uncovered - The Whole Truth About the Iraq War" when Franken's show is done.
Monday, September 13, 2004
Apparently, about half the country is dumb enough to succumb to this sort of idiotic statement:
By Thursday, the vice president was ready to get into domestic policy. In an economy that's shown a drop in jobs, an increase in poverty and a reduction in average real income, he told an audience in Cincinnati, the government statistics missed all those Americans dealing on eBay. "Four hundred thousand people," vaunted Cheney, "make some money trading on eBay."
Fortunately, half of them (i.e. Murph) are apparently not that stupid, including most "trial lawyers," AKA Heroes of Common Human Beings:
As Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards said in a quick statement, "If we only included bake sales and how much money kids make at lemonade stands, this economy would really be cooking."
She wrote a good poem about 9/11. Some Damfacrats don't like her stuff. Can't imagine why.
Thru Jesus' General.
Others have already said it but it's worth echoing. Women and children in Iraq are dying to help W in the election.
This is true in many ways. The most recent example is the increase in air attacks. The Bush Crime Family does not want to fight it out on the ground because our troops will be hurt and killed. This may hurt their poll numbers.
Instead, they do sweeping air strikes that get a lot of "collaterals" killed. The many areas of Iraq that are completely controlled by rebels may soon, if not already, include Baghdad.
Of course, no one wants our military folks to be hurt or killed - that's why Damfacrats have a simple plan to save them. Everybody out now.
Library Chronicles tipped us to the new Top 25 ignored stories.
#20 involves the UN's warnings about extreme weather, consistent with climate change. Of course, the media has served up a crushing volume of hurricane coverage and not even raised the issue, from what we have seen.
At least Dick Gephardt raised it last week on Late Edition but WTF? The transcript page simply skipped that week. Not a conspiracy, just really fucking annoying.
Damfacrats don't despise the insulting liar Colin Powell any less but, to be fair, N. Korea is willing to allow foreign inspectors to examine the site of the big blasts. They were deliberately blowing up a mountain, says the North. Meanwhile, S Korea seems to believe that there was an accident of some kind involving missiles.
This story is a few days old. The California AG says there is enough evidence to support the suit, which alleges that the voting machine company lied about the reliability of its machines when marketing them to the state.
The system's key vulnerability is that county election workers or others with access to the machines could type in a two-digit code and create a second set of results that would then be forwarded to the state as the county's official tally, said Bev Harris, one of the activists who filed the case. She said the Diebold vote-tabulating equipment at the center of the lawsuit is used in 19 California counties, including Los Angeles County.
Timid Tim is so used to having the Republican shaft nestled betwen his buttcheeks that the "correct" language from the RNC talking points just eases right out of him. Everyone knows that David Kay, the WH boy, reported not just no weapons but no evidence of anything more than "rudimentary" programs - "No scientist, no documentation nor physical evidence of the production plants."
The Cartel stubbornly blares "no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction" in order to imply that there were a few laying around or some programs.
So, there's Greaseborad, right on cue. Of course, the "WMD" term is absurdin itself, but there is no hope of curing that, to separate bio/chem/nuke properly.
You really have to hear it to understand how breathlessly Russert repeats the misleading phrase in full:
... no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction ...
Knowing that Saddam Hussein does not have large stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction ...
So even though he knows there are no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction ...
Sunday, September 12, 2004
In recent weeks and months, as an uncensored voice for the Democratic cause, Gore has skewered President Bush's team for moral cowardice, the "lowest sort of politics imaginable," aligning itself with "digital brownshirts" who intimidate the press, and political tactics as craven as those of Richard Nixon.
On Monday Night Football, during the home New England Patriots game, in Foxboro, Mass., after the advantage shifted dramatically between the teams:
Madden, to his credit, ignored it. Fucking dickhead Michaels.JOHN MADDEN: It's what you call a flip flop!
AL MICHAELS: You're in the right state for that!
Damfa
So, I flew from NYC to Rochester, NY on Jet Blue, and back again. For some reason, my boarding pass got flagged "SSSS" and it was flagged on both parts of the trip.
I really have no idea why this happened. I have no idea how long it will last. I don't know who did it or why and I don't know if it is just for Jet Blue or for all airlines. One thing I do know, I had better give myself yet another half-hour when flying.
Outgoing - As I approached the normal checkpoint I was redirected to a separate line. A few pasengers were there, and I was sent down one side of a bunch of dividers. This is where they had three people assigned to do a more thorough search on me. Full search of my carry-on by hand and an extensive wand-search, entailing my sitting on my tail and lifting my socked feet.
Return - Directed into a small cordoned area where everyone could see me go through the same routine.
Still, this is nothing like what Bob Harris endured and what he endured is nothing like what many protesters endured after being arrested in NYC.
If I am on some kind of DHS watch-list because of my politics, The Revolution will happen in my lifetime.
Monday, September 06, 2004
Few or no posts for the next week or so. For John Kerry, Bob Dylan lyrics:
No reason to get excited
The thief he kindly spoke
There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke
But you and I we've been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us not talk softly now
The hour is getting late.
The law varies from state to state but the essence is universal.
The AP's attempt to acquire further documents from AWOL's Guard record, which could verify his presence and/or the results of his absence, has been finalized with a shrug: nobody has the documents.
Here's the rule in North Carolina, for example:
where a party fails to introduce in evidence documents that are relevant to the matter in question and within his control . . . there is a presumption, or at least an inference that the evidence withheld, if forthcoming, would injure his case.
Chris Bowers explains how this country is affiliated 33/29/38 dem/rep/ind.
Funny thing in that Newsweek poll - it used a sample that was 31/38/31. No wonder the result was so dramatic - Bush 52, Kerry 41, Undec 7.
Using the right sample, the poll result would be B 49, K 43.4, U 7.6. That's a small bounce with which we can live.
Thru The Sideshow.
Sunday, September 05, 2004
Greaseboard Tim:
MR. RUSSERT: Pat Buchanan, we are now hearing on the wires that Mr. al-Douri, the number-two to Saddam Hussein, has been captured. So we now--and there he is on the screen. We now have a situation where Saddam Hussein and his number two are in captivity. Is the world not safer without them presiding over the country of Iraq?
Reality:
U.S. Maj. Neal O'Brien of the Tikrit-based 1st Infantry Division said he could not confirm the report and U.S.-led forces issued a statement saying he was not in U.S. custody. A senior U.S. diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Americans had no information to indicate that al-Douri had been arrested.
"Remember, there were 300,000 dead Iraqis in unmarked graves." - Newt G., Meet the Press, this morning.
Timid Tim Greaseboard, asleep at the wheel again:
Downing Street has admitted to The Observer that repeated claims by Tony Blair that '400,000 bodies had been found in Iraqi mass graves' is untrue, and only about 5,000 corpses have so far been uncovered.
The claims by Blair in November and December of last year, were given widespread credence, quoted by MPs and widely published, including in the introduction to a US government pamphlet on Iraq's mass graves.
At first it seemed the Swifty Liars were the root of Kerry's slippage. They definitely had some minor affect but the real source, especially in regard to the sickening double-digit leads in the recent Newsweek and Time polls, was the Russian terrorist attacks.
The planes blew up on August 24th, a rare news item that most Americans would actually notice, despite having nothing to do with Paris Hilton. Having fixed their attention over there, many voters also noticed the suicide bombing near a subway on August 31st, followed by the horrific school tragedy, which began on September 1st and which everyone noticed. Dead children get noticed.
Three major t'r events in a European country means a Bush bump, because the yokel swing voters use a very simple paradigm - Republicans kick ass, Dems love healthcare. Every time Kerry talks about domestic policy, he reinforces that false dichotomy.
When Kerry is slipping and on the defensive day-to-day (see, last six weeks), we panic and demand spastic personal attacks against Bush. This is based on the view that stupidity is rampant and only the personal, not issues or policy details, will change such people's minds. Upon calmer reflection, there is really only one message that Kerry needs to convey - Bush has not made us safer from t'rr. The blogs seems to concur with Carville's "it's 9/11 stupid."
Run ads about inflaming Arabs with reckless policy and execution. The failed Road Map. Osama's "statement" that he supports Bush. Arab polls where half or more support suicide bombings. No explosive detection at airports. No safety at ports and borders, chemical plants and nuclear facilities. Too many global loose nukes. Coddling the Saudi oil connections, despite Wahabi schools. Osama on the loose. Spies in the Pentagon, failed t'rr prosecutions, domestic right wing t'rr. 9/11 happened on his watch.
Scare the voters shitless (see Daily Show) - it worked for Karl Rove. Now turn it back at him.
"What I tell people, I would be surprised but not necessarily shocked if we wake up tomorrow and he's been caught along with all his lieutenants. That can happen because of the programs and infrastructure in place," [Joseph Cofer Black, the U.S. State Department coordinator for counterterrorism] told Geo.
Someone has already made a site to prepare for the celebration.
About half an hour earlier, security workers spotted a passenger bypassing security at United Airlines' Terminal 8 by running up a down escalator, TSA spokeswoman Jennifer Marty said. Security officials ordered the evacuation of the terminal and two connected terminals in order to re-screen passengers.
After about 40 minutes, security officials gave up searching for the passenger, who had gotten off a plane and went back into a secure area, said Larry Fetters, the airport's TSA security director.
"He probably remembered that he forgot his sunglasses in the area and went back to get it," said Fetters, adding that such incidents were not unusual nationwide.
Keep this in mind while the Republicans tell you that we are facing the greatest threat ever imagined from t'rr:
Using the odds of dying in a terrorist related attack during your lifetime as noted below from the CDC, let's compare them to the odds of dying from a long list of real, everyday dangers.
1 in 88,000 of a terrorist attack
1 in 1,500,000 of a terrorist-caused shopping mall disaster assuming one such incident a week and you shop two hours a week
1 in 55,000,000 in a terrorist-caused plane disaster assuming one such incident a month and you fly once a month
Saturday, September 04, 2004
What country does he think this is?
[Kerry] predicted voters would reject cynical politics when they went to the polls on Nov. 2. "All this negative advertising, blah blah blah," Kerry said. "It turns people off."
Friday, September 03, 2004
Thru a Buzzflash reader, we see that the Thugs continue to break laws while laughing in the face of Americans. The enRoNC used the Presidential Seal as a prop, with Bush standing on it and also with it placed on the special elite box. This is yet another outrage:
The US Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 33, Section. 713, says:
(a) Whoever knowingly displays any ... likeness of the great seal of the United States, ... in, or in connection with, any ... public meeting, ... telecast, or other production, or on any building, monument, ... for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
Over at I Like To Write, Steve is pushing people to contribute money to ACT, the Get Out the Vote people who brought us the Will Farrell video.
If you like the video and if you know the Bush Cartel is playing you for a fool, throw five or ten bucks to ACT and report it in the comments here. Or more. So far, Steve has pulled 290 dollars in just one day.
All you regular readers, you Damfacrats, you know who you are, so don't try to weasel out. Chip in or Bush will laugh in your face for another four years. Don't wake up on November 3rd and think "what more could I have done?"
It occurs to us that hammering the jobs theme is not worth much. Let's say there are as many as 7% unemployed, in reality. That's about maybe 18,000,000 people, at most. Let's cut that by 2/3 to get the number of people who actually vote, to 6,000,000. Let's cut that by a third to get the number of people who aren't insane no-matter-what Republicans. So maybe, maybe, there are 4 million votes out there from unemployed people. In the swing states, where it matters, there are maybe a million, scattered throughout. Of those, at least forty percent are already Dem voters.
So, we are talking about, at the very, very most, maybe 500,000 unemployed votes up for grabs. It is probably more like 50,000.
Those still-consuming-comfortably voters who have jobs are thinking: "job loss - not my problem, suck it up, like Arnie says ... Bush doesn't control who gets a job."
Must. Go. Negative. On. Character. Personality. Competence. Must. Lampoon. Bush. Fuck. Issues.
Fearful pussy.
"On September 11th in New York, we learned that in the hands of a monster, a box cutter is a weapon of mass destruction."
New Time poll of "likely voters":
Bush 52%
Kerry 41%
Nader 3%
Perhaps the media will turn against Bush, to tighten the election, keep up suspense and ratings.
This is no time for pollyannas on the Dem side. Assume the worst.
Step One - get enough attention. Start making the most outrageous and hard-hitting claims possible against Bush. Anyone who thinks that Americans will easily see through the GOP parade of lies is totally kidding themselves.
Step Two - stop trying to win the media's favor. Attack the media and embarrass them when they interview Dem talking heads. The media is for Bush so it can't get much worse for the Dems.
Step Three - change all the language. The Bushies are not "Very Conservative" they are Radicals and Extremists, Corporate Cronies and Defense Complex Warmongers. Other changes:
"Smears and Attacks" - ---- "Lies and Insane Rants."
"President Bush" ----- Dubya. Shrub. President Flightsuit, Plastic Turkey, etc. Never, ever use a term of respect for this criminal.
"Flawed and Failed Policies" - No. "Corrupt and Traitorous Corporate Schemes"
... and so forth ... the outrageous language will prompt incredulous reporters to ask "isn';t that a bit too harsh?" whereupon the Dems can prove it.
Step Four - Bush will lie about his record during the debate and laugh at Kerry when he tries to recite facts. Kerry must prepare for this and prepare to be casual, yet abusive. Somewhere, Kerry has his true thoughts, which were revealed briefly when he said "these guys are the most crooked, lying group of people I;ve ever seen." Time to go there.
Telling video from last night. Thru Atrios. Also this clear picture of shame. ...and a great Daily Show video.
Kerry wakes up and begins to punch back, incorporating the phrase that's been around for a while among heroes trying to fight the good fight.
Politically, given the sycophantic media, it is probably bad for Bush that there is so much tragic news today. Then again, his speech was so feeble and dishonest that he might have taken some shots during a full focus. Clinton heart trouble. Hurricane Frances. Russian attempt to free the school hostages results in scores of deaths, including many, many children. Like two years ago, except the rebels are still in there:
Some 129 hostages and 41 rebels died when Putin sent troops to overpower Chechen rebels who had seized a Moscow theater in 2002. But the violence in the region and elsewhere in Russia has continued.Awful.
The new jobs report indicates 144,000 new jobs in August, which will probably be reduced after adjustments like previous reports this year. Last months report was 32,000 and even the biggest liars struggled to put on a happy face. The new number merely shows that the economy is keeping up with the rise in population but will no doubt be trumpeted as a huge success by the Bushies and the telescreen.
A state judge in Manhattan yesterday angrily ordered the city to release more than 550 protesters who had been detained without seeing a judge - some for as long as 60 hours - after they were arrested at demonstrations against the Republican National Convention. When not all the protesters had been released by 6 p.m., he held the city in contempt and ordered a fine of $1,000 for each person still held, without setting a time frame.
The judge, John Cataldo of State Supreme Court in Manhattan, demanded during a noon hearing that the city immediately process the demonstrators. Throughout the afternoon, knots of exhausted but relieved-looking protesters with disheveled clothing and grime-covered hands and arms emerged onto Centre Street from the Criminal Courts Building.
Damfa
Arrival - total paranoia. The feeling that all the "normal" people were staring. They are thinking "why does this guy have a purple worker's pass and a suit on, and why does he have that weird beard?" Almost none of the men had beards of any kind. Paranoia! They know, they know! Eventually, I learned that I could go anywhere but the floor and the elite rooms, and people were not suspicious of much.
Signs - totally weak. A couple times, while I was seated in the sparsely populated area behind the stage, watching the big screen, someone tried to force a flag on me, or a sign. I waved my worker's pass. They backed off. It's like a purple immunity idol, warding off all partisan peer pressure. The dumbest sign, featuring a misspelling: "Bush/Cheney - Get Use to It"
Mischief - I saw about a half a dozen heros act up and get yanked out of there. I only heard the yelling once or twice. During the Shrub speech, I heard a security guy behind me whispering "go, go , go" into his little lapel mic and turned to see them swarm some protestor. The crowd has learned to chant "four more years" in defense. Fun fact - the crowd was far, far more interested in seeing a heckler get a beat-down/hog-tie than they were in whoever was speaking. As soon as someone set it off, every, I mean every head on the floor turned around like the girl in the Exorcist to watch the action, while their beloved Leader was speaking.
Security - Pretty lacking, after all. With just a pass and a trip through a metal detector, a person could get any number of weapons or plastic explosives into this place (Goodness forbid). A dog or two wandered by as we ran the gauntlet just outside the entrance but I'm not sure they were omnipresent. On the very top floor, where all the media boxes were, one could easily storm in and take over a camera or pull off any number of evil acts at random. Especially as the event wound down, it was easy to get near major political figures. I was very tempted to rush Speaker Denny Hastert and hassle him about his George Soros slurs.
Facecrime - So I didn't throw myself into the arms of Secret Service like the heroes mentioned but I was able to show dissent in many ways. I was allowed to stand just off the floor among the kool-aid drinkers. I refused to applaud. I made a variety of faces - disgust, disbelief, eye-rolling, dismissive body language, head-shaking. When other chanted "four more years" to blot out heckling, I chanted "drown out dissent." I was able to speak in a normal voice during applause, plenty snarky, as those around me glanced nervously at me, security gaurds hovered, but always wimped out when I gazed at them defiantly. I pulled the old Belushi "bullshit" cough a few times while the crowd was hushed and, when Bush had finihed and came over to wave at our part of the crowd, I did the old "I've got something irritating my eye, better use my middle finger to get at it."
Inspiration - Very little. This crowd was not inspired by Bush's words and the applause was forced. Bush did his "I'm a Democrat" routine tonight and minor speakers were talked over, mostly. Confusion reigned when Pataki introduced Bush enthusiastically and all we got was some old song for four minutes, followed by a movie about Bush and his post-9/11 baseball toss, saving us all from sin. Finally, the Dubya himself. Weak, weak, weak.
The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called. ----- George Orwell, 1984
Damfa interviews Paul Begala at 34th St. and 8th Ave. - Audio - mp3 - 290K - 1:30
Thursday, September 02, 2004
Saletan writes something good and a lot of bloggers are linking to it:
In a democracy, the commander in chief works for you. You hire him when you elect him. You watch him do the job. If he makes good decisions and serves your interests, you rehire him. If he doesn't, you fire him by voting for his opponent in the next election.
Not every country works this way. In some countries, the commander in chief builds a propaganda apparatus that equates him with the military and the nation. If you object that he's making bad decisions and disserving the national interest, you're accused of weakening the nation, undermining its security, sabotaging the commander in chief, and serving a foreign power - the very charges Miller leveled tonight against Bush's critics.
Are you prepared to become one of those countries?
We all remember ther name of that accounting firm that was embroiled in massive scandals, right?
Theresa LePore, the official whose confusing butterfly ballot design contributed to the turmoil of the 2000 presidential election and became the butt of jokes on late-night talk shows, lost her bid for re-election Tuesday.
With all 692 precincts reporting, a challenger for her post as Palm Beach County elections supervisor, Arthur Anderson, had 91,134 votes, or 52 percent, while Ms. LePore had 85,601, or 48 percent.
He will speak tonight at the enRoNC gala. Why are we not surprised? His long-shot VP odds just improved.
The cops just "sweep it all up," "go massive," "things related and not," so to speak. In the Times:
"It is almost easier to explain what you are not getting here," said Ted Koppel, anchor and managing editor of ABC's "Nightline," when he was asked why news organizations have given little time to the protests. "What you are not getting here is a replay of 1968 in Chicago."Thanks, Ted, for being totally inaccurate and misleading because it is "easier." This is like reporting someone is arrested for shoplifting and saying "what you are not getting is a serial killer."
Everyone is talking about how this Undertaker challenged Chris Matthews to a duel during the post-convention interview. MSNBC has the clip posted. Scroll down and it's on the left.
...speaking of addled, we fixed the link. It goes to the MSNBC front page and the Zell video can be accessed by clicking the "New Video" choice in the left column. Sorry bout that.
msnbc -
FALLUJAH, Iraq - A U.S. airstrike late Wednesday targeted a suspected safehouse in Fallujah used by followers of Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, U.S. officials said. The attack killed 17 people, including three children, and wounded six, hospital officials and witnesses said.
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
The Colorado prosecutors walk away from their flimsy "white-woman-raped" case against a wealthy and talented black man. Innocent unless proven otherwise, Kobe Bryant gets his life back from the all-powerful state.
The blogs will spring into action and explain why so much of what Zell just said was pure hypocrisy. Zell voted the same way, etc. It won't help. That was a truly vile display of hate and fear. The ugliest form of militaristic pseudopatriotism. It will work like a charm.
It was for this moment that we endorsed Wes Clark.
UPDATE: Deep breaths ... maybe Zell just sounds like the total whack-job demagogue that he is. Hell, maybe nobody is even watching ... in the words of Dennis Kucinich: "Courage, America"
The straight coverage on C-SPAN was too nauseating, so flip over to MSNBC. Big mistake.
Dear Hardball,
Your panel discussion about Dick Cheney, including the so-called historian, was perhaps the most transparent apologist routine I have ever witnessed, and I have watched your program way more than I should. You have disgraced yourself and revealed how ridiculous you have allowed your journalistic "ethics" to become.
Andrea Mitchell declaring that Cheney "believed " this or that about nukes? It is common knowledge that Cheney spread lies that even his own administration had
abandoned.DISGRACE
SHAME
Damfa
Sure, the Dem Con was scripted. Not like this. We have witnessed a video of a smiling, laughing Karl Rove chasing Barney through the grass. We have witnessed token minority after token minority whore their souls. We have heard lie after lie, and cheap shot after unfunny mockery.
At this point, it is very difficult not to conclude that if the American people fall for this third-rate sideshow, they deserve whatever they get.
This link is for our friend from Georgia, Steve. The movie at the link just ran on MSNBC. Good move.
Here's what one can do with an hour or two, some very basic Windows apparatus and an unflinching desire to punch back. --- 30 second ad - 875K - WMV file
(Thanks to the DU, Robert Dobbs)
This page is interesting and does a good job of showing where the damage was before the collapse of the E Ring, indicative of a plane. The page's theory is that the plane was smaller than the reported Boeing 757 but we are not convinced. We are, however, quite convinced that there is a a lot of horse hockey being thrown around by the government and the press regarding this crash.
The page also links to an elaborate thoery of what happened to the "real" planes on 9/11, which is interesting but internally flawed in many ways. "Flight of the Bumble Planes" suggests that the first three planes (all under-filled with passengers) were unloaded at a military base, where they were then packed into Flight 93, which then took off and was shot down deliberately. For what it is worth, we have always believed that Flight 93 was shot down, mostly because a huge chunk of the engine turned up a few miles from the crash site.
Our basic theory at this point is simply that the government wanted to cover up how easy it was to smash a big hole in the Pentagon, in order to downplay vulnerabilities .... still ...
...
... still ... we're wondering ... do you have to shape antenae with the foil to make it work properly or can you just form a brim like a baseball cap?
In a late Tuesday night court filing, the [Justice] department told U.S. District Judge Gerald Rosen it supports the Detroit defendants' request for a new trial and would no longer pursue terrorism charges against them. The defendants at most would only face fraud charges at a new trial. ...
... In a June 2003 jury verdict hailed by the administration as the breakup of a terror cell, Koubriti, 26, and Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi, 38, were convicted on terrorism and fraud charges and Ahmed Hannan, 36, was convicted of fraud. A fourth defendant, Farouk Ali-Haimoud, 24, was acquitted.
She is a terrible surrogate, and the result of her strategic ability is what is now at 1600 Pa. Ave ... as we have been saying ... O Dub concurs.
Boston wins again. The New York Yankees lose 22-0, their largest loss in the 101-year history of the team.
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
The coverage is even more of a joke than we expected. Here's the permissible "challenge" to the convention: The GOP is putting three moderates in front to hide the "conservative" truth of the party. All the talk, over and over, is about Rudy, Arnold and McCain.
This line of discussion actually helps bolster the GOP purpose, because R, A and Mc get even more attention, and both the "moderate" word and "conservative" word sound good to middle American focus groups. It might be fair if they said "radical" or "extreme." instead, hey, it's a Big Tent, folks.
Aside from that, and especially for Tweetie Matthews, the election is over and Bush has won. Laura is more popular than anybody and T'rr is what it's all about this year.
Good tinfoil hat stuff. Joe at Photon Theory linked to this fascinating movie.
If Flight 77 didn't really crash into the Pentagon, what happened to it? Who really knows what to believe anymore?
One of the things we do here is point out when we think a mega-popular left wing blogger is off the mark. We don't link to Pandagon or Matt Y, and these two posts are good examples of why we do not.
Pandagon and Matt Y think the protests are incoherent and they both launch a snobby and tortured thesis about how protests of this kind are worth little or nothing on the grand scheme of politics.
... each and every person there had something to say, but the protest as such didn't have much of a message, so it's hard to know what to say about it (Matt)
... making the product a muddled mass of bodies assembled for...things, rather than a uniform group advocating an [sic] single policy (Ezra)Um, maybe they missed the theme of the day: Say NO to the Bush agenda and express opposition to this little thing called the Invasion of Iraq. Maybe they missed the fact that this was the largest protest against any convention, which might just cause some folks, especially young people, to pause for a second and wonder why everyone is so upset. Maybe they haven't considered the manifestation of the severely divided condition into which the GOP has plunged this nation. Perhaps they haven't considered how many people donated money to causes or signed up as volunteers in that motivating environment. Maybe they believe that there are more people being persuaded by reading their internet writings than there are people seeing images of hundreds of thousands rejecting George W. Bush on the national news.
Let's see how these guys feel about protests in ten years, when the GOP has become the one-party oppression machine, we are in a forever war all over the world and such events are prohibited in the "interest of national security."
P.S. Ricky at Timshel happened to post something about Matt Y at around the same time. He's right.
Get out your deception dollars. From Zogby:
On the eve of a Republican National Convention invoking 9/11 symbols, sound bytes and imagery, half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act," according to the poll conducted by Zogby International. The poll of New York residents was conducted from Tuesday August 24 through Thursday August 26, 2004. Overall results have a margin of sampling error of +/-3.5.
The poll is the first of its kind conducted in America that surveys attitudes regarding US government complicity in the 9/11 tragedy. Despite the acute legal and political implications of this accusation, nearly 30% of registered Republicans and over 38% of those who described themselves as "very conservative" supported the claim.
At NPR, including the Jerry Garcia quote re: "Yellow Journalism"
Bonus: Bob Weir interview on NPR. (warning - weak song played in interview)
Eric Alterman notes that the nearly twenty percent of enRoNC delegates are active military, which seems to be against Dept. of Defense regulations. The convention site he linked to has been scrubbed, apparently, but the story is still on the GOP.com site.
Proudly beaking the law, as usual.
Here's the Yahoo PR Release, in case they scrub that one too.
Ollie says he can get his fellow Damfacrat into the Garden for the big finish, featuring the Smirker himself. Should be great fun, especially if a tape recorder and a Wingnut find each other. Still, the lineup really looks weak. Dorothy Hamill? Lynn Swann? Token Black Guy: Michael Williams, Texas RR commissioner.
The bloating and disgusting BS, and ghoulish reliance on 9/11, makes it tempting to simply ignore blogging about this Liefest. Until Thursday, anyway ...
Monday, August 30, 2004
The Dems, like the GOP, have a Truth Squad operating during the convention. They will get even less attention than did he GOP truth squad.
Let's look at one of the perceived strengths of George W. Bush and his party, compared to the reality: National Defense.
1. 9/11 - The worst domestic attack in American history occurred on their watch, as did the Anthrax attacks. To date, they have been unable to punish Osama or even identify the Anthrax attacker.
2. Spies - Someone in the Bush administration outed a CIA field agent and now we learn that there is an Israeli mole in the Pentagon.
3. Nukes - Secrets went astray at the Los Alamos Laboratory, forcing its closure. North Korea has developed nuclear weapons and Iran is progressing to that end. They have to find out from Pakistani intelligence that AQ Kahn, a Pakistani scientist, has been selling secrets about nuclear technology to dangerous regimes. Kahn was immediately pardoned by the Pak government. They have failed to make the global danger of loose nuclear materials a priority.
4. War - They promised the world that Iraq had WMD and invaded Iraq, only to find that there were none, miring us in a quagmire costing many lives and almost 200 billion dollars. Doing so managed to inflame passions against America all over the world, resulting in widespread advocacy of suicide bombing against the US and the hatred of long-time allies. Everyone agrees that our military is now stretched to its limit. Afghanistan continues to get worse, becoming a narco-state that if rife with attacks against U.S. forces and nation-building actors. Gitmo and Abu Grhaib have shamed our nation and further inflamed enemies, needlessly.
5. Domestic Security - They are proceeding with the development of a missle defense shield, which has never worked and has nothing to do with terrorism. They have failed to install explosive detection devices at airports, failed to monitor more than 2% of cargo at ports an borders, failed to fund protection of chemical and nuclear plants, and failed to effectively enforce laws that protect our borders from illegal immigration. The color-code, duct tape and plastic system is a national joke.
6. International Terrorism - Terrorism is up (not down, as the State Dept. "mistakenly" claimed before acknowledging the truth). Spain, Morrocco, Russia, SE Asia, Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, to name just a few, have all experienced major terrorist attacks in the last year.
These are just examples we could think of without research. Do voters need any more?
We aren't sure what the Master Plan is here. Maybe Dubya is just flying blind. Let's summarize what he has said in the last few days: "John Kerry did not lie about Vietnam. John Kerry was more heroic than I was because he went into combat. The War on Terror cannot be won and miscalculations in Iraq resulted in a catastrophic success. Sure, North Korea has nukes but I don't think we should give timelines to dictators."
Our best guess is that these comments are meant to deflect blowback for the Vet-Liars campaign and deflect the perception that Bush is too arrogant to admit mistakes, as well as too reliant on military means to activate international change. Perhaps these things are more of a problem than the polls indicated.
As in 500,000. Thru Talking Dog, we notice the NY Times report on the protest numbers. Forget the vague junk from the AP about "tens of thousands" or even the Wash Post "over 200,000."
The protest organizer, United for Peace and Justice, estimated the crowd at 500,000, rivaling a 1982 antinuclear rally in Central Park, and double the number it had predicted. It was, at best, a rough estimate. The Police Department, as is customary, offered no official estimate, but one officer in touch with the police command center at Madison Square Garden agreed that the crowd appeared to be close to a half-million.
We are entering a dark time in the campaign, which will last for the next couple of weeks, at least. The media is more shameless and incompetent than ever, and the enRoNC festivities will be stroked vigorously.
Gallup shows that Pennsylvania is a tie, which, if at all accurate, is a massive decline for Kerry. Digby and Teixira see this as the natural earthbound trend after the Dem convention bounce (which did happen, despite the media script) and contend that Kerry has weathered the Swifty attacks well. We can hope that this period is the best it will get for the Shrub.
Also, we have to keep reminding ourselves that aMurka's ignorance can work to our advantage. We have to remind ourselves that almost nobody watches these idiotic news programs anyway. Whereas maybe 2 million people watch O'Reilly, for example, most of them wouldn't vote for Kerry in a million years anyway, and O'Reilly is by far the top show. Less and less people read newspapers.
The voters will stay ignorant until the debates, whereafter they will vote based on hair, sighs, accents, ads and who they think will win - like people who ignore the regular baseball season and become avid Yankees fans as the Series approaches. This last part is what troubles us the most. To the extent that voters check the horserace, the media is straining to make it look like Bush is ahead, so this may be the media's most poisonous influence.
Has anyone else noticed this subtle taking point among the GOP puppetheads?
Someone on a show finally mentions the fact that Bush said Kerry did not lie about Nam. Then the GOPer floats the Point: Bush is not being sincere, just playing nice.
Bush cronies lie and say Kerry lied. Then Bush says Kerry did not lie. Then Bush cronies say that Bush is lying about his belief that Kerry did not lie. Hence, Kerry lied, so elect Bush. Insane.
Caught the rerun of Press the Meat. Timid Tim got out his markers again, so he could laugh about the theft of 2000. What a fathead clown.
Olbermann used the right term (and analysis) on Thursday:
To put a number on it, Zogby says just the blue and red states right now would make it Kerry 286, Bush 214 in the electoral college, so much of a margin that even if both remaining yellow states, Missouri and Florida, went to Mr. Bush, it wouldn't matter. Still, Kerry by 34 votes; 16 more than needed for electoral certification. Tim Russert would not even have time to get out his grease board.
Sunday, August 29, 2004
Bush was quoted recently as saying that the Iraq invasion was a "catastrophic success."
1. This term is so Orwellian that reporters are literally explaining it in opposite ways. Look at how this AP reporter explains:
He called the swift military offensive that led to the fall of Baghdad in April 2003 "a catastrophic success" even though fighting continues despite the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's government.Now compare that understanding with this version, which is what Bush wanted to convey:
The first take puzzles at the term, thinking it means simply a "large" success, while the second take understands the idea of just being "too damn good." It's kind of like when they ask you at an interview "what is your greatest fault" and you answer "I'm a perfectionist."Mr Bush raised eyebrows in his latest defence of the Iraq war, referring in an interview to the "catastrophic success" of the initial invasion, which he said created problems further down the line.
"Had we to do it over again, we would look at the consequences of catastrophic success, being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day," he said.
2. Anyway, this little Orwellian description has already been floated by two head honchos in the Regime:
The U.S. general [Tommy Franks] who routed Saddam Hussein's army in three weeks warned before the invasion that a quick victory could lead to a "catastrophic success" because the United States was not prepared for postwar anarchy in Iraq.and ...
Rumsfeld (April 11, 2003): This is fascinating. This is just fascinating. We did... recognize that there was at least a chance of catastrophic success, if you will, to reverse the phrase ... and that we needed to be ready for that; we needed to be ready with medicine, with food, with water.3. John Edwards has it right about Bush's new Doublethink words: "He's half right."
Damfa
12:10 Arrival at 14th and 7th Ave. Things are so crowded that people are asked to move North on 6th and enter the protest between 16th and 18th. The signs are very creative and the police are chill. LaRouchians on each corner. Helicopter and blimp in the sky. Pall bearers solicit help as mock flag-draped coffins gather.
12:45 Enter the main protest on 7th Ave. The crowd can barely move. Some people are selling rows and rows of bumper stickers and buttons. Purchase a two-dollar peace sign button. Lots of old people and small children also despise the Shrub. A man in just US flag-shorts and boxing gloves jabs at a plastic Bush doll until onlookers cheer the knockdown. The cops let anyone sit on top of phone booths, bunched barricades and I perch on a lamppost for a while.
1:30 Approaching the Garden. Spot the huge Green Dragon Float. Drumming is cool. Chants begin but fade quickly. Out of style. Everyone is smiling, everyone is polite. Obtain a Deception Dollar.
1:45 The crowd moves faster at the Garden entrance but they are free to linger as long as they like. A huge row of cops stands a few feet from barriers. Waving my Deception Dollar around, taunting the suits. A few people begin to wave their own actual dollars. Most of the cops look at the deception dollar and some smile. Chants are more sustained: "Shame! Shame! Shame! Shame! " Many people flip The Bird(!). I go for the thumb-down.
2:15 I leave 7th on 34th to meet Ollie, who is working AV inside the Garden. Machine guns in this area and I can't go back into the crowd or linger at the corner. Ollie and I decide to go over to 10th, south four blocks and back into the march for another pass at the Garden.
2:45 Because of the barriers on many cross streets, things might have gone tough for some elderly folks. Ollie and I helped a very thin old man in a suit climb over the barrier so he could get out of the crowd. It was very hot and sunny and he seemed dazed. Others helped immediately. Back in the crowd, spot two women holding rubber heads on a stick - Condi and Laura. Very nice.
3:00 Nearing the Garden again. Ollie spots faint smoke up ahead. Turns out this is the much publicized torching of the aforementioned green dragon float. (Times are approximate on this post) A sort of Love Drum Corps does a sort of cheerleader pyramid routine. The girls hold cardboard cutouts of machine guns, colored pink with the word "Love" on them. It's quite wonderful.
3:15 At the Garden again. I spot the same guy I saw on the first pass, who I had seen mouthing "Blah Blah Blah" as we walked by. I pointed at him and said it back to him, taunting. He tried to look menacing - he looked psychotic. People approach the huge Fox News ad and chant "Fox News sucks!" Rounding the turn at 35th, a heckler for Bush starts up. I ask him how many funerals Bush went to. He asked me how many I wnt to. I said I wasn;t the President - but of course - neither is Bush. He said we don't care about the troops. I told him that's why we are marching because we don;t want any more dead. He floundered and ignored.
3:45 Down Broadway, approaching Union Square finish line. Jeebus people around - holding the infamous signs for Bush. I begin to yell and others join in, "Who would Jesus Bomb?" The crowd is way more spread out on Broadway. Union Square is chill, and I hang out for a while. A man in a wheelchair gives me a war criminal deck of cards. Bush is only the 4 of Clubs, which tells you something.
During the march, three photographers stopped me to photograph the Deception Dollar up close. They were all Asian, for whatever that is worth.
This thing was a massive success and as far as I know, there was no violence and very few arrests, mostly for blocking traffic. When there are 200,000 to 400,000 people and like twenty people get arrested, it is not a "mostly peaceful" affair. It is a totally peaceful affair - much to the disappointment of the GOP.
Seems like now is a good time to raise a middle finger in the direction of the Washington Post, for its hideously unfair Nader slam a couple weeks ago.
Seems like now is also a good time to raise a middle finger in BoBo's direction. Remember his January column?
The full-mooners fixated on a think tank called the Project for the New American Century, which has a staff of five and issues memos on foreign policy. To hear these people describe it, PNAC is sort of a Yiddish Trilateral Commission, the nexus of the sprawling neocon tentacles.
Saturday, August 28, 2004
That evil-doer Novak just pointed out something on CNN's Capital Gang. Ben Barnes, the man whose videotaped confession, about helping AWOL Boy into the Texas Guard, showed up yesterday, managed to get something wrong.
On the tape, which we were thrilled to link to, he says he helped Bush when he was Lt. Governor. Sadly, as we just posted last week sometime, he was the Speaker of the Texas legislature at the time.
Now, he can use the Bush/Rice/Cheney/Rumsfeld excuse, that he just "mispoke," but the damage is done. Can't these Dems get anything right?
CNN will show "The Mission of George W. Bush" on Sunday night. CNNfn ran it this afternoon so we got to see most of it.
Review: John King, CNN lead WH reporter, didn't dig too deep. In that sense, it was easy on the Shrub. However, it was not as forgiving as we guessed it would be and King usually made sure to note how divisive Bush and his policies are. Lots of creepy Jeebus footage earned our approval.
In a related note, Catman recommends the Frontline episode on Georgie's Jeebus view, especially Parts 3 and 4.
Why else would they deliberately mention Al's brand of vehicle?
ED HENRY, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Near the home of the world famous New Year's Eve bash, Democrats have invaded Time Square to send a message. They're here to crash the Republicans' party. Al Sharpton happened to be driving down 42nd Street. He hopped out of his Cadillac to give the new billboard a thumbs up.
Even John Glenn gets to be victimized by Judy Woodruff and her unending quest to handjob Bush back into the White House.
WOODRUFF: But I interviewed John Glenn, the former senator today. I asked him if John Kerry had brought this on himself to some degree by talking so much at his convention about his Vietnam War experience. He said he agreed that that had happened, that to some extent he did bring it on himself. Was that a mistake?
So, is this what Glenn actually said? Woodruff ran her interview later in the program:
WOODRUFF: I spoke with Senator Glenn a little while ago and I asked him if Kerry brought this issue on himself by focusing so much attention on his own war record.
SEN. JOHN GLENN (D), FMR. U.S. SENATOR: Well, possibly to some extent...
... WOODRUFF: But don't you think John Kerry could have avoided this to a large extent by focusing himself on the future at the Democratic convention?
GLENN: He probably could have said more about that at the convention. I wouldn't disagree with that. I think he was proud of his military record, as he should be. ... Maybe he invited it, I wouldn't even make a judgment on that.
The Democrats in Congress need to return from vacation and simply refuse to participate in anything until a law is passed to require varification safeguards. Seriously.
Goddam brutes. The word here in East Harlem, via Tall Walt and Ollie, is that they arrested more like 250. The Voice confirms. Good luck proving that the specific people arrested were responsible for a specific violation:
The two-hour ride began about 7:15 p.m. in Union Square with a cacophony of bells, whistles, hooting and howling, and the police seemed to tolerate it.
An hour and a half into the ride, the police patience appeared to grow thin, as helmeted officers dragged netting across Seventh Avenue and 14th Street to block the ride.
Hundred of cyclists at first gathered by the net and then most turned west on 14th Street and south on Greenwich Street and kept riding toward the East Village.
More arrests took place at the end of the ride in the East Village, including along Second Avenue outside St. Mark's-in-the-Bowery Church, where cyclists gathered for a celebration of the ride and shouted abuse at the police who were arresting their companions.
"Ninety-five percent of the ride was beautiful,'' said Bill DiPaola, executive director of Time's Up!, an environmental group that participates in and promotes the monthly ride. "People were cheering us on the streets, but at the end it was difficult to funnel
people off and it was very clear the police were upset at how well the ride went.''
Wow. Video of former Lt Gov. of Texas Ben Barnes, openly apologizing for getting Dubya into the National Guard. Thru Atrios.
Man. The FBI is about to nail a mole in the Pentagon, who was spying for Israel while working under Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith. Jeebus.
Friday, August 27, 2004
Most people are basically stupid. Americans are even more so. Sorry if that seems harsh but we know it's true.
Karl Rove knows it's true and has pinned every public message with that in mind. It has worked pretty well for him, largely because logical fallacies go unrecognized by most Americans, if they even pay attention in the first place.
With this unshakable premise in mind, Kerry must forget about winning on policy. If Americans had any notion of good or bad policy, Bush would already have a 3% approval rating. America's ignorance goes hand-in-hand with cynicism, which protects them from their ignorance, by making them feel that there is no reason to pay attention, since all politicians just lie anyway.
With the flipper concept hung around Kerry's neck, he needs to rely not on promises of an ucertain future but on the documented personality faults of the Fuckwit-in-Chief. Kerry's ads need to focus primarily on video of the Shrub at his worst. For example, saying stupid things, looking stupid, scribbling on the flag, his DWI sheet, signing Jesus Day into law as a governor, Top Gun footage and, of course, overtly flip-flopping on two dozen issues.
Using the media to prop up small ad Vet-smear tactics. Veterans have gone from tied in the polls to 46-39 for Bush.
What does the Cartel do to try and milk this? Issue tr'r alert to VA Hospitals.
This spastic secret-agent-cover-blower interviewed another Vet against Kerry who claimed to be an independent. Trouble is, Josh Marshall clicked around and discovered the guy gave $1000 to Bush in 2000 and 2004, and is "the new law partner of one of the guys running the Republican National Convention."
"Damfacrats clearly does more research than the New York Times or any newsmedia in the U.S. for that matter." -- Swift Boat Veterans for "Truth" v. The Truth
They linked to Damfacrats here regarding our post here. Thanks also to Corrente and American Politics Journal for the links.
Atrios linked to a post about Ben Ginsburg's possible ethics violations, in terms of his possible pro bono work for the Swifties and fee arrangements. Ginsburg, of course, was forced to resign from Bush/Cheney and claimed publicly that he never informed Bush/Cheney that he had given counsel to the Swifties.
To the Damfacratic legal team (Dr. Damfa, Esq.), the obvious unethical behavior is the failure to inform either of the clients that the potential conflict existed. Look at what Ginsburg said to the Blank-Stare Blitzer:
This last part is complete garbage. First, let's be clear that Ginsburg's representation of the Swifties amounted to a classic Conflict of Interest, because it exposed Bush/Cheney to embarrassment and charges of illegal coordination.BLITZER: Did you tell people at the Bush-Cheney campaign that you were also giving legal advice to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth?
GINSBERG: Not until yesterday with the exception of a conversation on the legalities, a generic conversation of legalities of representing both campaigns and 527 groups. But nobody at the Bush campaign or the White House knew of my dual representation, which is appropriate under the legal ethics rules.
BLITZER: Since you were working for the campaign earlier, wouldn't it have been appropriate first to ask the campaign, do you have a problem if I also give advice to this other Swift Boat group?
GINSBERG: Well, Wolf, I didn't do that for three reasons. The first is that the legal ethics rules really require lawyers not to talk to different clients about the work that they're performing for other clients.
When a potential conflict exists in regard to representing two clients, the exact opposite of what Ginsburg said is true: a lawyer must disclose the situation to both clients, at the very least, and usually obtain their clear consent, and must drop one of them if the conflict is unavoidable.(b) Except as permitted by paragraph (c) below, a lawyer shall not represent a client with respect to a matter if:
2) Such representation will be or is likely to be adversely affected by representation of another client; (3) Representation of another client will be or is likely to be adversely affected by such representation;
(c) A lawyer may represent a client with respect to a matter in the circumstances described in paragraph (b) above if each potentially affected client provides consent to such representation after full disclosure of the existence and nature of the possible conflict and the possible adverse consequences of such representation.
To the NYT and USA Today.
Clearly, the most newsworthy remark was that Bush does not think Kerry lied about his Vietnam record. That should be blasting all over the telescreen, given four weeks of Swifty attention, but it isn't - probably because the media, besides being worthless, lazy and sycophantic to Bush, is embarassed by their 100% responsibility for promoting the lies.
The award for most illegitimate question goes to USA Today, asking Bush why he has not given up running again and simply quit politics.
"That is a legitimate question," he said. "There's a lot of my friends who come and bass-fish with me. They don't say it out loud, I know they're thinking it: Why?' And the answer is because the stakes are high.See, Dubya is just a normal guy, the type who sports a bumper sticker "I'd rather be bass-fishing."
Other interesting bits include Bush's "acknowledgment" that there were "miscalculations" in regard to Iraq (using the old 'dead-enders' theory about 'winning too fast'), his confusion about his own administration's new-found acknowledgment of global warming and this classic projection:
"It seems my opponent said that going to war with the terrorists is actually improving their recruitment efforts. That logic is upside-down," he said.
Damfacratic readers will have seen our previous posts on the AP's Ron Fournier, the sometimes harmless, sometimes perverted Bushie Boy. Today we find him up to some of his obscenities again:
Headline: Bush, Kerry Bow to McCain's Wishes on Ads.
See, this is already a problem. While Kerry did pull an ad featuring McCain, Bush continues to avoid condemning the Swifty Lies, which McCain clearly "wished" that he do, reiterating that "wish" again yesterday. Fournier, amazingly, claims that the "wish" was for the Shrub to join the silly 527 lawsuit, even though Shrubie has been "wishin'" for their demise now for a couple of weeks.
... as a decorated Vietnam veteran, Kerry argues, he is capable of replacing the incumbent Republican while the nation is at war." Ah, no. Kerry "argues that" as a non-corrupt, non-chimp, non-Churcher-Crusader, he is capable of replacing the unelected smirker "while the nation is at war."
McCain sought to take Bush off the hook, suggesting that the president had gone far enough in condemning the accusations. Hmmm ... no exact quote on this ... let's see what the Post says:
In an interview with Washington Post editors and reporters, McCain said that he is grateful for Kerry's action and that he still hopes Bush will condemn the Swift boat veterans' ad attacking Kerry's service. McCain added that he plans to raise the issue when he campaigns with Bush next week.Why would McCain "raise the issue" again if Bush had "gone far enough?" Still, Fournier won't let go of his fantasy: McCain suggested, and associates privately confirmed, that he had accepted Bush's statements as proper condemnations of the anti-Kerry ad.
To wind it all up, Fournier queers a poll result: A CNN-USA Today survey shows that people believe 2-to-1 that Kerry is probably telling the truth about his Vietnam record. Just "probably" Ron? From USA Today:
the poll found that most people, 63%, say they think Kerry is definitely or probably telling the truth about his military service.Hell, even the Preznit himself thinks Kerry is definitely telling the truth :
Bush did not hesitate when asked about the central charge issued by the Swift Boat veterans' group that has leveled unsubstantiated attacks against Kerry's record in Vietnam. "I think Senator Kerry should be proud of his record," Bush told The Times. "No, I don't think he lied."
Thursday, August 26, 2004
So what should happen is that any illegal activity by these protestors should be considered a terrorist act on its face. Putting the lives of New Yorkers in danger by distracting the police is terrorism, period.
There are reports of some anarchists who are going to douse themselves with gun powder to cause security alarms to go crazy. We also hear some of these people may roll marbles underneath the hooves of police horses. Any of that stuff is terrorism and the federal government should take over the prosecution.
Instead of being slapped on the wrist, violent and damage causing protestors should be slapped with federal prison time. Most Americans value protest. I certainly do. But we're fighting a war here. And any act that puts this country in danger is sabotage. Again, a terrorist act.
Click animation for Pocket Oh Really and click here for bonus audio.
Karl Rove gave Brit Hume an interview yesterday. We aren't sure of the last time the Minister of Disinformation showed his pasty face but Hume acknowledged it was "the first broadcast interview in years."
The purpose of the interview, on it's face, seemed to be the act of getting Rove on camera, flatly denying any coordination with the Swifty Liars. That way, Fox and Co. can force Dems to accuse Rove of "lying," a charge that is always confirmed by the media script to be shrill and outrageous.
We are just wondering if his emergence is a good or bad sign. Our guess is that it's a good sign. For whatever reason, probably because focus groups hate Rove, he has stayed in his hole all this time. Being forced into the light, kind of like Jenna and lil Babs, may be a sign that big league Bush supporters were demanding some reassurance and reinforcements.
Anyway, Rove twisted the truth in almost every response, including lies about his contact with Swifty funds Bob Perry in the last year, whom he had previously said had been out of contact for a year; vague lies about Kerry lawyers' connections to 527 groups, and this:
HUME: Has anybody in the Bush campaign or the White House, to your knowledge, engaged in any consultations, coordinations, cooperation, with the swift boat veterans group?
ROVE: No, absolutely not. Absolutely not.
Except, of course, Ben Ginsburg, who had to resign, and Ken Cordier, who had to resign...
WASHINGTON - The number of Americans living in poverty increased by 1.3 million last year, while the ranks of the uninsured swelled by 1.4 million, the Census Bureau reported Thursday.
It was the third straight annual increase for both categories. While not unexpected, it was a double dose of bad economic news during a tight re-election campaign for President Bush.
Approximately 35.8 million people lived below the poverty line in 2003, or about 12.5 percent of the population, according to the bureau. That was up from 34.5 million, or 12.1 percent in 2002.The rise was more dramatic for children. There were 12.9 million living in poverty last year, or 17.6 percent of the under-18 population. That was an increase of about 800,000 from 2002, when 16.7 percent of all children were in poverty.
During the news break of Special Report, Fox reported on the incident in Florida where the father of a dead Marine torched the Marine's van after they arrived to inform him. The Fox anchor said it was "his son's van." Creepy.
Wednesday, August 25, 2004
This is the guy the cowardly Bush Boy sent out to obstruct Max Cleland today, when Max was trying to deliver a letter to said Shrub. Patterson, who was never wounded during his service, had his own letter.
With all due respect for Patterson's son, who is apparently an active Marine, besides the well-reported money Patterson has gotten from Bob Perry, who funds the Swifty Liars, and Patterson's gun-nut (this too) and Oil & Gas devotees, we found the following, which was part of a Patterson screed in defense of the Confederate Flag:[The letter] steered clear of the Swift boat veterans' charges, saying instead that they are "concerned about the comments you made AFTER you came home from Vietnam," referring to Mr. Kerry's role as an antiwar leader in the early 1970's, after his decorated naval service.
... "I tried to accept that letter and he would not give it to me," Mr. Patterson told The Associated Press, referring to Mr. Cleland. "He would not face me. He kept rolling away from me. He's quite mobile."
Even though I am not proud of slavery, I can continue to honor symbols of the Confederacy as I honor the American flag. I am as proud an American as they come. I am, however, not proud of what my country did to the American Indian. I have pride in my service as a U.S. Marine in Vietnam, but I am embarrassed at the atrocities that occurred at My Lai. I still wear a small Vietnam service pin on my lapel, knowing that not everything done in Vietnam is worthy of pride.
Raven
From Ad Age, a marketing expert focusing on the US image abroad and testifying before Congress:
"Even with careful planning such an effort is likely to meet with failure at this time. Based on everything we know, the U.S. government is simply not a credible messenger," he said. "In present circumstances in the Arab and Muslim world, the need to strengthen and elevate the voices of those within the Islamic faith and culture who oppose radical ideas is a task much more effectively performed by non-government actors than by the government."
Catman
Ten ways Bush has specifically screwed NYC.
One thousand reasons not to vote for him. (it's over 1300 now).
When they came to his door to tell him that his son was killed in Najaf, he doused their van with gasoline, got in and set himself on fire.
Is this what it takes to make America notice the grief that this pointless war has caused?
UPDATE: We just saw the CNN Headline News ticker report that the man "mistakenly" set himself on fire. Where are they getting that? We just checked the Fox News ticker and even FOX is reporting it as "set himself on fire after getting into the van."
Raven
I'm sick of the starry-eyed, feel-good stories NBC has exploited about Iraqi and Afghanistan athletes participating in the games. Not that having women compete for the first time from those countries is bad - far from it. However, Raven can't help thinking the message at the end of the pieces always comes back to one clear message: "Re-elect George W Bush". What a joke, and the people will eat this shit up. "Oh, so that's what the war on terror is all about. What a great job he's done 'fightin' for freedum'."
These Swifty Goons were represented by a lawyer who is the top lawyer representing the Bush campaign, Benjamin Ginsberg. He had to resign from Bush/Cheney '04 today. Tsk tsk.
In other Swifty news, the Nixon tapes reveal that John O'Neil, the primary goon who has vehemently denied that anybody ever went into Cambodia illegally during the war, is cold busted for being a liar: "O'NEILL: I was in Cambodia, sir. I worked along the border on the water.NIXON: In a swift boat?O'NEILL: Yes, sir."
Maybe Kerry has been playing the rope-a-dope game after all...
Raven
Like Nathaniel Heatwole:
A STRING of breathtaking security blunders allowed me to clinch a job as an airport baggage handler — and take a fake bomb on a packed holiday jet.Looks pretty damning for the English.
From Inside Politics:
WOODRUFF: Jill Dougherty in Texas, covering the president and the vice president. Interesting, as you say, on two counts. Number one, because he openly talked about the fact that his daughter is gay. And, secondly, because one of the rare occasions we hear the vice president saying his views are different from the president.As far as we know, there was never any other such occasion. Well, unless you count all the times Bigtime decided to "late hit" and tell lies about Iraq that even the adminstration had already stopped telling. Anyway, Lynne must be uncomfortable:
On Sunday, when ABC's Cokie Roberts started to ask the GOP vice presidential nominee's wife about having a daughter who has "declared she's openly gay," an irate Lynne Cheney shot back: "Mary has never declared such a thing." Cheney then blasted the media for its interest in the story, and chided Roberts: "I'm surprised, Cokie, that even you would want to bring it up on this program." (July 2000)
Tuesday, August 24, 2004
Meredith fears it is unconstitutional to change a state's electoral system by referendum. He fears a court battle. Fair enough, although Damfacratic comments there raise questions.
Our point is still this - the Dems have to try. In fact, maybe if it actually fell in the Supreme Court's lap again somehow, they would refrain from interfering this time, because two elections in a row would be just too absurd.
Bwawwck. 63 million. 63 million. Baaawck. Kerry brought it on himself. Bwee bwee. Brought on himself. Bwuckie wuck. Noble service. Noble service. Taaweeeeet. 63 million. Brought on himself.
After some disappointments here and there, recently - One of the best blog posts ever written.
So the video buff gets a quick indictment and faces 55 years but the actual fake terrorist, as opposed to the simply fake terrorist, gets his case delayed until...after the election?
Judge Delays Fake Anthrax Case Sentencing 8:05 p.m. ET PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- A judge has delayed the sentencing of an anti-abortion extremist who was convicted of mailing fake anthrax to women's clinics, saying the Supreme Court must first clarify the legality of federal sentencing rules.In other abortion clinic terror news ... what's this? More time for the bona fide terrorist to gear up a defense:
Judge Gives Rudolph Lawyers More Prep Time 6:49 p.m. ET BIRMINGHAM, Ala.(AP) -- A federal judge on Monday gave attorneys for alleged serial bomber Eric Rudolph more time to draft a plan for fighting charges in a fatal attack on an abortion clinic. ...We're not suggesting any rigged judges. Just good old Due Process, holding things up, unlike how it is down in Gitmo - or whenever Arabs are involved.
... He is also charged in three bombings in Atlanta, including the one that killed a woman during the 1996 Olympics.
We've been keeping up with the video buff's case. Looks like he'll get fifty years for overstaying a visa and lyin' to the po'-lice:
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) -- A federal grand jury indicted a Pakistani man for alleged immigration violations Monday, a month after police spotted him videotaping the Charlotte skyline.
Kamran Akhtar, 35, of New York City, was charged with six counts in the indictment, but none of them involved terrorism.
The indictment charges Akhtar with two immigration violations and four counts of lying to investigators after he was detained by police on July 20. He could face up to 55 years if convicted on all charges.
Monday, August 23, 2004
The new Zogby battleground states poll. Zogby's WV numbers have been a bit different than others, so it's not that surprising to see Kerry eight behind now. Looks like it was a tie before the Swifties launched. Ohio is not too promising either but they are a bit slow in those states. Ahem.
The great news is that Kerry is leading by 2 in Tennessee, almost 3 in (wait for it) Arkansas and almost 2 in NV. Plus, our blue states seem to be pulling away. So, margin of error, all that, but we'll decide to be optimistic.
You just made the list. For this crap:
Bush Says 'That Ad' Attacking Kerry Should Stop
CRAWFORD, Texas (Reuters) - Under pressure from Democrats and Republican Sen. John McCain, President Bush on Monday called for ads attacking John Kerry's record in Vietnam to be stopped along with others run by independent groups, and said Kerry should be proud of his war service.
"That means that ad and every other ad," Bush said when asked if he wanted to bring a stop to commercials by a group called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, which accuse Sen. Kerry of lying about his war record in Vietnam.
Two years in this Ministry of Love and now they are presumed innocent?
If acquitted, they still could be held indefinitely under Bush administration policy that considers them enemy combatants in the ongoing war on terror prompted by the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that killed about 3,000 people in the United States.
They could be freed only if a separate military panel finds they are not a danger and have no information that could prevent future attacks, military officials said. "They could still be held, depending on the outcome of the war on terror, or the decision they are no longer a threat or an intelligence [concern]," McWilliams said. ...
... The panel includes a presiding officer who is a lawyer, Army Colonel Pete Brownback, and four military officers who have no legal training. Brownback will run the proceedings, but all decisions, including the final verdict, will be made by a majority vote among the five, McGarvey said. She said the defendants are presumed innocent and must be proved guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt."
But the spectacle of veterans tilting in favor of a slacker regime (Bush & Cheney) and against a combat veteran could not be more ridiculous. And it isn't even the first episode; it's a repeat of the Repug Bush/McCain primary.
MaxSpeak hereby declares that all veterans supporting Bush on the basis of Kerry's service record are completely full of shit. I have lost all respect for them. They have soiled themselves.
Good for what ails ya:
"People think Texas is George W. Bush country," Dean told hundreds packed into the Houston International Theatre School on Saturday. "But right now, 40 percent of Texans would vote for a yellow dog before they place a vote for George W. Bush."
A little. Just saw, on "Sunday Best of Fox," Bill Mahr forcing Hannity to admit that the Presdient should have gotten up and done something on 9/11 besides reading with children.
Sunday, August 22, 2004
Nothing looks good today for America. Americans continue to die in Iraq, with 963 now gone, despite the AP's delayed reporting of 949.
Secret software voting machines and confusing ballots are still a huge problem.
The Swifty debate is just quicksand for the inept Dem talking heads. They need to do something drastic, really drastic. Forget parsing details and forget hiding behind Unka McCain, who tells folks to vote for Shrub despite everything. Boycott all discussion of the Swifties ... something, anything to change the subject. Let Clinton sacrifice a shred of his tattered Presidential image and enter the fray, somehow, something.
Halliburton floats above it's own filth, playing patty-cake with the Army. Irani related sword-rattling is on the rise.
The media is largely useless and whenever it grows balls it soon runs back into its hole.
Honduras had to issue a terror alert based on who knows what.
Gitmo detainees are getting their big day in kangaroo court while Wingers declare the current US Supreme Court dangerously liberal.
The EnRoNConvention is arriving next week and the Thugs want everyone to expect Dem-inspired violence.
Liberals in NJ are corrupt and Liberals in Claifornia are out doing hate-crimes against evangelicals.
The Damfacrats are feeling very low today. Maybe we shoulda gone with Howard Dean after all...
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A young couple shot in their heads as they slept on a remote California beach may have been killed because of their evangelical Christian religious beliefs, police said on Saturday.Wingers take flight.
The former Enron lobbyist, now RNC chair:
I think the Democrats are going to have to be careful about not letting the protesters get out of hand," Mr. Gillespie said. "The line between the official Democratic Party and labor protesters, environmental protesters and antiwar protesters is fairly blurry, and I'm not sure they want to have Democrats engaging in violence in New York against our convention. It would seem disrespectful and antidemocratic."
Dwight Meredith has a post about the ballot initiative to change Colorado's system from winner-take-all to proportional by percentage. If it passes and takes affect immediately, the state's nine votes will be divided between Kerry and Bush. You can read more about it in USA Today, WaPo and Talk Left.
We respect Meredith's intellect and particularly his posts debunking the merits of so-called tort reform. We think he is wrong to resist the Colorado thing. Here are previous Damfacratic posts on it, especially in relation to the "tie-goes-to-Bush" reality.
The only question that matters to anyone who wants Bush gone is whether the change helps Kerry. Meredith worries about a scenario where the Dems win a majority and the intiative ends up shooting Kerry in the foot. Despite recent close polls and macro-trends, all the evidence points to Bush victory in Colorado. Since the Dems must decide immediately whether to support the measure or not, they cannot afford to bet the farm on an outright win.
He also worries about a slippery-slope in Blue states, wherein California must one day give up half it's EVs because they copy Colorado. Our guess is that the GOP will begin trying this type of thing in all the Blue states, and much worse, regardless of whether the Dems back down in Colorado.
Meredith correctly notes that the extra four votes will only help Kerry if the outcome from other states leaves him with either 266, 267, 268, or 269 votes. One of those numbers is rather likely to exist, if Florida and Ohio "go" for Bush again and we have to play a sort of "small ball" to win it.
The states that are most likely to go from Red to Blue, assuming that all other states go the same way as 2000, are NH(4), WV(5) and NV(5), in that order. Also, Maine could quite possibly give up one to Bush. So, here are the Kerry-win combos where the extra four would be essential: NH+WV (269), NH+NV (269), WV+NV -1 in ME (269).
Even if Kerry wins a majority in Colorado, and the votes get split, he'll still get five from there, which means that he can win it all with just one more flip state, say WV or NV. If Colorado remains winner-take-all, and Kerry wins, Kerry still needs one more flip state to surpass 269. Thus, Kerry will lose under either system if Colorado is the only converted state.
Meredith is also correct that Kerry is better off with winner-take-all in Colorado if his vote count outside the state is 261-264. He points to a NH flip, which is the only such outcome without a Blue-state flip. Otherwise, in a our "small-ball" scenario, a Blue flip is required to arrive at 261-264, either ME, NM or WI, for example, and, those scenarios require accompanying Red-flips. All these permeations become complex and meaningless very quickly, so they are little upon which to base opposition to the Colorado change.
Meredith wonders whether it will pass. As we have said, the Independent and 3rd-party folk will be in favor. If the Dems are 100% in favor, thanks to a strong PR effort, a 3%/48%-Indy/Dem combo can make it happen. A whiny Colorado GOP is clearly against the measure, which should tell us something.
Will it be legally applicable to November? Our guess is that the Sec. of State would not have approved it if it was unconstitutional on the fed or state level, but the real answer is: who cares? We have to try. Then he says it is unfair to candidates, to which we have the same answer: who cares? These are greaseball partisan tactics, just like Texas redistricting, and if will probably help Kerry this time, let the future be damned.
The essential point is that the Dems must decide immediately that they will support this measure. It needs to be part of a big PR campaign there, so that every Dem knows to vote YES when they go to the polls. It was smart to try this in a state where the Dems + Indys were likely to breach a majority. We all know what's at stake. Support Amendment 36.
A dishonorable old bastard. Just his opening statements to Blitzer are enough to show that. He said, roughly "one day Kerry is protesting the war and the next day he is running for President and trying to be a war hero." Yeah, Bob, 30+ years and one day, that's the same. He even took some shot at Kerry's wounds, like "well, they didn't bleed."
Of course, Blitzer treats Dole like a King of Integrity, with absolutely no recognition of Dole's transparent partisan agenda. Blitzer is so devoid of follow-up, he's like a deaf guy who can speak.
President Bush's Hispanic nephew -- he's the grandson of migrant worker Jose Maria Garnica -- is in Mexico on a week-long visit to drum up support for his uncle among the estimated 1 million Americans living there.
The younger Bush, whose father is Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and mother, Columba, is originally from Mexico, acknowledged at a news conference that the war in Iraq is not popular in Mexico but defended the military action, saying "we're almost done with it.''
She can drive ya nuts but she is right this time. 100%. We were wondering why nobody in the blogosphere seemed to even comment on Clinton's August 9th Daily Show appearance. To us, the Big Dog was sending a clear message and MoDo picked it up too:
Bill Clinton implied two weeks ago that Mr. Kerry was acting sluggish. "Whenever they hit me, I hit 'em back," he told Jon Stewart. "And whenever they came up with a charge I didn't believe was true, I answered back."Here's what Damfacrats expressed on August 7th:
GET THE GLOVES OFF QUICKLY - Anyone who thinks that the Swift Boat Liars thing is not going to hurt Kerry is totally wrong. Americans are, in fact, that petty.
The media has played the thing 10,000 times this week and the Dem heads are doing a bad job of deflecting it. McCain's word won't help all that much because everyone knows he will continue to fluff the AWOL Boy's pillow, so how upset can he really be?
We cannot let the GOP set a precedent with this attack by getting away with it. They need a kick in the balls. Grab the most cheap-shot Move On or 527 ad off the cutting room floor and run it. Bare knuckle time.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.



